Home
News Headlines
News Blog
Links
Tesla Roadster

Nikola Tesla
Biography


Tesla
Flying Machine



A Simple
magnetic motor



Electric Cars

Electric Motors

Generators and Alternators


Historical Super Carburetors


Books on Super Carbs


Mighty Yet Tiny engine, NASA 1st prize



H.J. Magnet Motor



Future Denied


The Pacheco
Hydrogen Generator


A Hydrogen Generator
you can build


many more Hydrogen Generators
others have built



Dennis Lee

Energy Inventions
(suppressed)



Hydraulic cars & info

Mike Blood's
Hydraulic dragster
1997


Don Banky's
Hydraulic Car
1955




I.V.T. / C.V.T.


Oil News







ELECTRIC MOTORS




to understand the differences and the issues

and get some real-world examples

As a rough rule of thumb, DC electric motors can produce
approximately 1 hp per pound in the size range of 50 to 100 hp


Electric motors have a huge power density benefit over gasoline-fueled internal combustion engines (ICE), particularly in terms of total peak power - and a huge durability benefit in terms of only 1 moving part!
Thus, for a similar power rating, an electric motor can weigh as little as 50% of the weight of a comparable gasoline engine, yet still produce significantly more peak power. This is due to the much higher operating efficiency and short-term over-power potential of electric motors. Electric motors are usually rated in kilowatts (kW); 1 hp= 746 W (or 1 kW =1.33 hp).
( see John Wayland's "White Zombie" below )

The most efficient designs typically use permanent magnets (instead of coils) in the stators. These require less energy to create the basic magnetic field, with permanent-magnet brushless DC motors usually being much more efficient than older brush-equipped designs. They also offer much higher reliability and virtually no maintenance.

Although brushless DC motors require a more sophisticated controller unit (typically a three-phase, pulse width-modulated [PWM]), total efficiency is typically 3-7% higher than brush-style motor. (Brushless motors replace the brushes and commutators with a controller that electronically switched the power to the coils, eliminating the brush and commutator wear and arcing).

Brush-type motors can also be hazardous due to the possible use of hydrogen on board for the fuel cells and the risk of ignition from sparks produced by brushes.


Power Conversion Table   (+)
Amps x Volts = Watts
watts / Volts = Amps
1000 watts = 1 kilowatt
.75 kilowatts = 1 horsepower
1 kilowatt = 1.34 horsepower
5,280ft = 1 mile = 63,360"
a 15" tire of 195/65/15 is about 25" in diameter
which is a circumference of 78" = 812 revolutions/mile
and so 60 mph = 812 rpm. . . . 120 mph = 1,624 rpm
148 mph = 2000 rpm
(at the tire)
Torque Conversion:
1.3556 ft/lb = 1 Nm = 1 joule (of work)
1 Nm = 0.73756 ft/lb

1 N = 0.22507 lbf (lbs of force)


The most commonly used motors in EV conversions are series wound DC motors. Most new parts suppliers carry the Advanced DC or Warp lines of motors. There are also quite a few folks using older General Electric, Baldor, and Prestolite motors. Many older conversions were based on surplus starter/generators. While these are still available, they are difficult to mount, inefficient, and generally incompatible with modern controllers. A conversion based on one of these might be functional, but it would ultimately be disappointing. There are a few decent surplus motors available from time to time. Forklift and elevator motors are usually much to heavy to use, while golf cart motors are too small. Recently, AC drive motors have become available, and it is likely that more conversions will be using them. Another possibility:




Examples


John Wayland's White Zombie

White Zombie: Fastest street legal Electric Car
0 to 60 in ~3.5 sec's.
1/4 mi in 11.466 sec's. @ 114.08 mph
Powered by dual 8 in.(”Siamese 8″) Warfield Dual armature
series-wound motors for 240+ hp w/ 772 ft. lbs. torque.
read more about it


The Quickest electric motorcycle: the KillaCycle

the KillaCycle team

In Nov 2007, the KillaCycle made a quarter-mile
run in 7.824 seconds and hit 168 mph
it weighs about 600 lbs.

It has two modified 6.7 inch Model L-91 Advanced DC Motors
The battery pack has/had a total of 990 A123 Systems M1 Li-Ion cells with a total weight of 180 lbs. read more about it


Advice on how to build your own Electric car
from some more people with experience


Jerry's (1st) Electric Car Conversion

Jerry's (2nd) Electric Car Conversion

"Doing a conversion"




Electric Aircraft?
Electric-powered aircraft offer many benefits including dramatic improvements in reliability and safety, lower maintenance and total lifecycle costs, significant improvements in environmental compatibility (noise, emissions and fuel), improved performance, and improvements in ease of operation and passenger comfort.

The biggest benefits are reliability and safety. With only one moving part (motor armature plus propeller), electrically powered aircraft should be far less susceptible to failure; there's not much to fail.

from www.kitplanes.com/magazine/engines

Strength of an electromagnetic field

The strength of the electromagnetic field is determined by the amount of current, number of coils of wire, and the distance from the wire.

Unit

The unit of magnetic force is called the tesla (T). Near a strong magnet the force is 1-T. Another unit used is the gauss, where 104 gauss (10,000) equals 1 tesla.

Current

The strength of the magnetic field is proportional to the current in the wire. If you double the current, the magnetic force is doubled.
Since Voltage = Current x Resistance (V = I*R), you can double the current in a wire by doubling the voltage of the source of electricity.

Turns of coil

If you wrap the wire into a coil, you increase the magnetic force inside the coil, proportional to the number of turns. In other words, a coil consisting of 10 loops has 10 times the magnetic force as the wire uncoiled, with the same current flowing through it. Likewise, a coil of 20 loops has 2 times the magnetic force than one with 10 loops.

Varies with distance

The magnetic force decreases with distance. It decreases proportionally to the square of the distance. For example the force at 2 cm. from a wire is 1/4 that of at 1 cm., and the force at 3 cm. is 1/9 the force at 1 cm.

Effect of an iron core

When the coil is wrapped around an iron core, the strength of the electromagnetic field is much greater than the same coil without the iron core. This is because the atoms in the iron line up to amplify the magnetic effect. The orientation of the atoms in the iron is called its domain.

Current

When you increase the current, the magnetic strength increases, but it is not exactly linear as it is with the coil by itself. The characteristics of the core cause the curve of magnetic strength versus current to be an s-shaped hysteresis curve.
The shape of this curve depends on how well the material in the core becomes magnetized and how long it remains magnetized. Soft iron loses its magnetism readily, while hard steel tends to retain its magnetism.


Inductance


Inductance (measured in henries) is an effect which results from the magnetic field that forms around a current carrying conductor. Electrical current through the conductor creates a magnetic flux proportional to the current. A change in this current creates a change in magnetic flux that, in turn, generates an electromotive force (emf) that acts to oppose this change in current. Inductance is a measure of the generated emf for a unit change in current. For example, an inductor with an inductance of 1 henry produces an emf of 1 V when the current through the inductor changes at the rate of 1 ampere per second. The inductance of a conductor is increased by coiling the conductor such that the magnetic flux encloses (links) all of the coils (turns). Additionally, the magnetic flux linking these turns can be increased by coiling the conductor around a material with a high permeability.

The energy (measured in joules, in SI) stored by an inductor is equal to the amount of work required to establish the current flowing through the inductor, and therefore the magnetic field.

An inductor is usually constructed as a coil of conducting material, typically copper wire, wrapped around a core either of air or of ferromagnetic material. Core materials with a higher permeability than air confine the magnetic field closely to the inductor, thereby increasing the inductance. Inductors come in many shapes. Most are constructed as enamel coated wire wrapped around a ferrite bobbin with wire exposed on the outside, while some enclose the wire completely in ferrite and are called "shielded". Some inductors have an adjustable core, which enables changing of the inductance. Inductors used to block very high frequencies are sometimes made with a wire passing through a ferrite cylinder or bead.

Inductors are used extensively in analog circuits and signal processing. Inductors in conjunction with capacitors and other components form tuned circuits which can emphasize or filter out specific signal frequencies. Small inductances generated by a ferrite bead or torus around a cable prevent radio frequency interference from being transmitted down the wire. Smaller inductor/capacitor combinations provide tuned circuits used in radio reception and broadcasting, for instance.

Two (or more) inductors which have coupled magnetic flux form a transformer, which is a fundamental component of every electric utility power grid. The efficiency of a transformer increases as the frequency increases; for this reason, aircraft used 400 hertz alternating current rather than the usual 50 or 60 hertz, allowing a great savings in weight from the use of smaller transformers.

An inductor is used as the energy storage device in a switched-mode power supply. The inductor is energized for a specific fraction of the regulator's switching frequency, and de-energized for the remainder of the cycle. This energy transfer ratio determines the input-voltage to output-voltage ratio. This XL is used in complement with an active semiconductor device to maintain very accurate voltage control.

Inductors are also employed in electrical transmission systems, where they are used to intentionally depress system voltages or limit fault current. In this field, they are more commonly referred to as reactors.

As inductors tend to be larger and heavier than other components, their use has been reduced in modern equipment; solid state switching power supplies eliminate large transformers, for instance, and circuits are designed to use only small inductors, if any; larger values are simulated by use of gyrator circuits.




capacitor


While an inductor opposes changes in current, a capacitor opposes changes in voltage.

Imagine an electric car with the same acceleration capability as a gas-powered sports car, or ultrafast rechargeable “batteries” that can be recharged a thousand times more than existing conventional batteries. According to physicists at North Carolina State University, all of these things are possible, thanks to their research on a polymer - or plastic material - that when used as a dielectric in capacitors may allow the capacitors to store up to seven times more energy than those currently in use.

see the news: advancements in batteries and capacitors


Capacitor start motor


In a capacitor start motor, a starting capacitor is inserted in series with the startup winding, creating an LC circuit which is capable of a much greater phase shift (and so, a much greater starting torque). The capacitor naturally adds expense to such motors.

Permanent split-capacitor motor


Another variation is the Permanent Split-Capacitor (PSC) motor (also known as a capacitor start and run motor). This motor operates similarly to the capacitor-start motor described above, but there is no centrifugal starting switch and the second winding is permanently connected to the power source. PSC motors are frequently used in air handlers, fans, and blowers and other cases where a variable speed is desired. By changing taps on the running winding but keeping the load constant, the motor can be made to run at different speeds. Also provided all 6 winding connections are available separately, a 3 phase motor can be converted to a capacitor start and run motor by commoning two of the windings and connecting the third via a capacitor to act as a start winding.

Stepper motors

Closely related in design to three-phase AC synchronous motors are stepper motors, where an internal rotor containing permanent magnets or a large iron core with salient poles is controlled by a set of external magnets that are switched electronically. A stepper motor may also be thought of as a cross between a DC electric motor and a solenoid. As each coil is energized in turn, the rotor aligns itself with the magnetic field produced by the energized field winding. Unlike a synchronous motor, in its application, the motor may not rotate continuously; instead, it "steps" from one position to the next as field windings are energized and de-energized in sequence. Depending on the sequence, the rotor may turn forwards or backwards.

Simple stepper motor drivers entirely energize or entirely de-energize the field windings, leading the rotor to "cog" to a limited number of positions; more sophisticated drivers can proportionally control the power to the field windings, allowing the rotors to position "between" the "cog" points and thereby rotate extremely smoothly. Computer controlled stepper motors are one of the most versatile forms of positioning systems, particularly when part of a digital servo-controlled system.

Stepper motors can be rotated to a specific angle with ease, and hence stepper motors are used in pre-gigabyte era computer disk drives, where the precision they offered was adequate for the correct positioning of the read/write head of a hard disk drive. As drive density increased, the precision limitations of stepper motors made them obsolete for hard drives, thus newer hard disk drives use read/write head control systems based on voice coils.

Stepper motors were upscaled to be used in electric vehicles under the term SRM (switched reluctance machine).

Coreless DC motors

Nothing in the design of any of the motors described above requires that the iron (steel) portions of the rotor actually rotate; torque is exerted only on the windings of the electromagnets. Taking advantage of this fact is the coreless DC motor, a specialized form of a brush DC motor. Optimized for rapid acceleration, these motors have a rotor that is constructed without any iron core. The rotor can take the form of a winding-filled cylinder inside the stator magnets, a basket surrounding the stator magnets, or a flat pancake (possibly formed on a printed wiring board) running between upper and lower stator magnets. The windings are typically stabilized by being impregnated with epoxy resins.

Because the rotor is much lighter in weight (mass) than a conventional rotor formed from copper windings on steel laminations, the rotor can accelerate much more rapidly, often achieving a mechanical time constant under 1 ms. This is especially true if the windings use aluminum rather than the heavier copper. But because there is no metal mass in the rotor to act as a heat sink, even small coreless motors must often be cooled by forced air.

These motors were commonly used to drive the capstan(s) of magnetic tape drives and are still widely used in high-performance servo-controlled systems.

Series Wound DC motor

The distinguishing design of a Series Wound DC motor is that the field windings and the armature are electrically connected in series. Torque and speed control are achieved by a ‘throttle’ that varies the intensity of current flowing through the fields and the armature. Series wound motors offer very high starting torques and good torque output per ampere, but have generally poor speed regulation. DC motors have high torque at low speeds and decreasing torque as the speed increases.

This is how the golf carts were designed for many years. But there are some problems with this design. The largest problem was the ‘Free Wheeling’ nature of this system when the golf cart goes down hill. The only thing to keep the golf cart from going dangerously fast (if the hill is steep enough) is to use the Cart’s brakes. As accidents and incidents piled up, golf cart Manufacturing companies became increasingly concerned about creating an electric golf cart that has built in safety features. Enter separately excited field DC Motors.

Separately excited field DC Motors

The separately excited field DC Motors are different from Series Wound DC Motors primarily in the way the field is wound. Series motors create the electromagnetic field using very large wire and a high amperage.

It so happens, however, that you can get the very same flux field with much smaller wire and much less current flow by making many more turns. A field of flux, then, is a function of “Ampere (current)-Turns”.

The difference is very significant! A series wound field has a current of, say, 300 amps. The same separately excited field has a current of only 20 amps. It has been known for a long while that a computer programmed controller could be built to control a 300 amp field, but the components and size would be unacceptable if only from a cost standpoint. The 20 amp current of a separately excited field motor is a different story. A computerized program controller can be designed to provide a wide variety of control over the fields to result in a wide variety of performances. And the most important thing is that it could be built within an acceptable manufacturing cost.

So if a controller can be built to manipulate the electric fields of a DC motor, then we can Control the motor to make it do the things that we want it to do. And from this possibility came all these new innovations to modern day Electric golf carts. Rollaway Protection, downhill Regenerative Braking and Torque/Speed Controls for a wide variety of conditions are now available. The constant implication, of course, is that Safety features can now be created.




Single-phase AC induction motors



A common single-phase AC motor is the split-phase induction motor, commonly used in major appliances such as washing machines and clothes dryers. Compared to the shaded pole motor, these motors can generally provide much greater starting torque by using a special startup winding in conjunction with a centrifugal switch.

In the split-phase motor, the startup winding is designed with a higher resistance than the running winding. This creates an LR circuit which slightly shifts the phase of the current in the startup winding. When the motor is starting, the startup winding is connected to the power source via a set of spring-loaded contacts pressed upon by the not-yet-rotating centrifugal switch. The starting winding is wound with fewer turns of smaller wire than the main winding, so it has a lower inductance (L) and higher resistance (R). The lower L/R ratio creates a small phase shift, not more than about 30 degrees, between the flux due to the main winding and the flux of the starting winding. The starting direction of rotation may be reversed simply by exchanging the connections of the startup winding relative to the running winding.
The phase of the magnetic field in this startup winding is shifted from the phase of the mains power, allowing the creation of a moving magnetic field which starts the motor. Once the motor reaches near design operating speed, the centrifugal switch activates, opening the contacts and disconnecting the startup winding from the power source. The motor then operates solely on the running winding. The starting winding must be disconnected since it would increase the losses in the motor.

In a capacitor start motor, a starting capacitor is inserted in series with the startup winding, creating an LC circuit which is capable of a much greater phase shift (and so, a much greater starting torque). The capacitor naturally adds expense to such motors.

Another variation is the Permanent Split-Capacitor (PSC) motor (also known as a capacitor start and run motor). This motor operates similarly to the capacitor-start motor described above, but there is no centrifugal starting switch and the second winding is permanently connected to the power source. PSC motors are frequently used in air handlers, fans, and blowers and other cases where a variable speed is desired. By changing taps on the running winding but keeping the load constant, the motor can be made to run at different speeds. Also provided all 6 winding connections are available separately, a 3 phase motor can be converted to a capactor start and run motor by commoning two of the windings and connecting the third via a capacitor to act as a start winding.


Induction generator


The construction of an induction generator is essentially the same as that of an induction motor: Both have a squirrel-cage rotor and wound stator. When this machine is driven above its designed synchronous speed, it becomes a generator; at less than synchronous speed, it functions as a motor. Because the induction generator does not have an exciter, it must operate in parallel with the utility. This outside power source provides the reactive power for generator operation. Also, its frequency is automatically locked in with the utility.





Electric Motors

The various winding configurations of electric motors have lost much of their significance with the advent of electronic controls. The use of series fields over shunt, of DC power over AC have lost their advantage. Electronic Converters can give a shunt wound motor just as much starting torque as a series wound motor, and can convert AC to DC and back again to optimize voltage, current and frequency for maximum power and efficiency.

No matter how much the controls change, the basic fact remains that all electric motors use an alternating current in one or more windings. AC can be used direct, DC can be converted to AC either electronically or mechanically by the use of a commutator and carbon brushes. Traditional mechanical methods are simple and reliable, but cannot be optimal for all load-speed conditions. Electronic methods are often more efficient over a wider range of load-speed conditions, but are expensive and more easily damaged by transient voltages or currents.

Another basic fact is that motor torque is proportional to the number of armature amp-turns, armature size, and the strength of the magnetic field around the armature. The magnetic field increases with the amp-turns of the field. The increase is proportional until the magnetic path begins to saturate. The strength of the magnetic field is basically limited by the quality of the magnetic material. The amount of the magnetic field is limited by the area of the magnetic material and heat which limits field current. Armature current is also limited by heat. All small, high power motors require external cooling.

Motor power is proportional to torque and speed. One of the biggest advantages of electronic controls is the efficient conversion of power to high frequency AC. Motors with an excess of 400 Horsepower have been built with speeds greater than 20,000 RPM. The ability to put a lot of power is a small space is only available with electronic conversion.

Limitations of mechanical commutation limit maximum motor speed. Part of the job of commutation is to "discharge" windings as they leave one pole and head for another. In series wound motors, the location of the brushes is often shifted to optimize one direction of rotation. Large shunt wound motors often employ commutating field windings (aka interpole windings) between the main field windings. These are wired in series with the armature and induce a voltage in the armature to help neutralize the energy in the windings being commutated. Without commutating field windings, the brushes must dissipate this energy and can overheat at high speeds. High speed operation greatly increases brush wear.


Shunt Motors

The amount of voltage generated by a shunt motor is proportional the magnetic field and motor speed. The speed at which this generated voltage is equal to battery voltage with maximum field current is a critical design parameter in electric vehicle design. This speed is the maximum speed at which full torque is available, and is also the slowest speed at which simple regenerative braking can charge a battery. (Call this regen speed.) Dynamic braking can be used at slower speeds by connecting the armature to a resistive load. Above this speed, the motor is horsepower limited. Of course commutation limitations and mechanical strength limit maximum motor speed.

A typical driving cycle would start accelerating a vehicle from a stop with maximum field current, and armature current limited to a safe value. A constant motor torque would give a constant acceleration (neglecting increasing vehicle losses) until regen speed is reached. Above this speed, the armature is connected directly to the battery and armature current is maintained by a field current which decreases with increasing speed until maximum motor speed is reached. Torque decreases with decreasing field current so acceleration also decreases. At maximum speed, field current is increased to decrease armature current and torque as necessary to maintain a constant speed. To slow down, field current is further increased as necessary to cause the motor to reverse armature current and thus charge the battery. The vehicle slows down until maximum field current is reached at regen speed. Below this speed, dynamic breaking can be used to augment mechanical brakes. Note that mechanical brakes must be used in addition to regenerative braking if a fast stop is necessary. Maximum armature current must not be exceeded. As the motor temperature increases, maximum armature and fields currents must be reduced which significantly reduces maximum motor torque.

Note all the energy supplied to accelerate the vehicle is not recovered during regenerative breaking. One of the major losses is that a battery is recharged at a higher voltage then it is discharged. (i.e. a 144 volt battery might take 170 volts to charge, but only return 120 volts under load.) Another loss is the motors I2R losses, the heat created by current and resistance in the armature, and the power consumed by the field.

To correctly design an electric vehicle, the motor characteristics must be known. For a shunt motor the following questions must be asked:

     DESIGN VOLTAGE
     MAXIMUM RPM
     MAXIMUM TORQUE

     MAXIMUM OUTPUT POWER
     MAXIMUM CONTINUOUS OUTPUT POWER
     MAXIMUM ARMATURE CURRENT
     MAXIMUM CONTINUOUS ARMATURE CURRENT
     MAXIMUM FIELD CURRENT
     MAXIMUM CONTINUOUS FIELD CURRENT

     BACK EMF PER RPM AT VARIOUS FIELD CURRENTS:
          (Including maximum and max continuous)
     TORQUE AS A FUNCTION OF BOTH 
          FIELD & ARMATURE CURRENTS
     EFFICIENCY AS A FUNCTION OF SPEED AND TORQUE



As an example, the following shunt wound motor has been designed:

     DESIGN BATTERY VOLTAGE                       144 volts
     DESIGN BATTERY RESISTANCE                    .06 ohm
     REGEN RPM                                   3600 rpm
     MAXIMUM RPM                                 5000 rpm

     MAXIMUM CONTINUOUS TORQUE                     30 lb - ft
     MAXIMUM OUTPUT POWER                          40 hp
     MAXIMUM CONTINUOUS OUTPUT POWER               20 hp
     MAXIMUM ARMATURE CURRENT                     250 amps
     MAXIMUM CONTINUOUS ARMATURE CURRENT          125 amps
     MAXIMUM FIELD CURRENT                        3.5 amps

     MAXIMUM CONTINUOUS FIELD CURRENT             2.0 amps
     RESISTANCE OF ARMATURE                      0.04 ohm
     RESISTANCE OF FIELD                           40 ohms
     BACK EMF PER RPM AT VARIOUS FIELD CURRENTS:

     field amps          volts/rpm      torque/armature-amp
       0.0                 0.001            0.01

       0.5                 0.009            0.07
       1.0                 0.017            0.14
       1.5                 0.024            0.19
       2.0                 0.030            0.24
       2.5                 0.035            0.28
       3.0                 0.038            0.30

       3.5                 0.040            0.32



Obviously, the armature current is the difference between the applied EMF and the back EMF divided by the armature resistance. For example, if the applied voltage is 105 volts, and the back EMF is 100 volts, then 5/.05 = 100 amps. If either the motor speed or field current is increased, the back EMF would increase, the armature current would decrease, and torque would decrease. At zero armature current there would be no torque. With further increase in motor speed or field current, the armature current would flow in the opposite direction which would make the motor a generator. i.e. it would absorb mechanical power and supply electrical power.

The back EMF times the armature current represents real work, the power that is output after frictional losses are deducted. I2R losses include:

     1.  (Armature current)2  x  (Armature Resistance) 

     2.  (Field current)2  x  (Field Resistance) 



For example, with the motor at full continuous power:

     Speed   =   3600 rpm
     Torque  =     30 lb - ft

     Power   =   3600 x 30 x 2 x pi / 550           =    20.5 hp
                  20.5 x .746                       =    15.3 KW
     Motor Voltage       =  144 - .06 x 125         =   136.5 volts 
     Armature Current    =  (136.5 - 131.5) / 0.04  =     125 amps
     Field Current                                  =     2.7 amps
     Back EMF            =  .0365 x 3600            =   131.5 volts

     Power Input   =  136.5 x 125 + 2.7 x 2.7 x 40  =   17.35 KW   
     Efficiency          =   15.3/17.35             =   88 %



Note that the (17.35 - 15.3) 2.05 KW loss is dissipated as heat.

Now if the field current is increased to 3.5 amps, then the back EMF will equal the battery voltage (i.e. .04 * 3600 = 144 volts) and then the armature current and therefore torque would become 0. Or if the speed was increased to 3798 rpm then the back EMF would again equal battery voltage and the armature current and torque would be 0. With the field current at 2.7 amps and a speed of 3996 rpm, then the armature current would be minus 125 amps (i.e. the motor would be a generator charging the battery) and the torque would be minus 30 lb - ft.

If this seems complicated, it really isn't. Just remember the following:

1.   The field current determines the strength of the motor's magnetic field.

2.   The strength of the magnetic field times speed determines the back EMF.  
     (motor voltage without armature current)

3.   The difference between the applied motor voltage and back EMF, divided by the
     armature resistance, determines the armature current.

4.   The strength of the magnetic field times the armature current determines the

     output torque.

5.   The output torque times motor speed determines the output power.

6.   The sum of   (Armature current)2  x  (Armature Resistance)   and   
     (Field current)2  x  (Field Resistance)  determines input power.

7.   Output power divided by input power determines efficiency.




Series Wound Motor

To give a feel for a typical Series Wound Motor, a typical Advanced DC Motor is discussed below. Note that the picture below shows the basic construction of a series wound motor.

Typical Advanced DC Motor



Advanced DC Motors Model 203-06-4001

  amps = (5 * torque) + 85

  RPM = (286 * volts) / (10 + torque)0.5

The Advanced DC Motor Model 203-06-4001 is a typical, series wound motor that is often used in Electric Vehicles. It can be reasonably characterized with the above two equations. Note that torque is measured in ft-lbs. The motor is about 8 inches in diameter, almost 15 inches long (not including shaft), and weighs about 107 pounds. It is designed for a maximum voltage of 120 volts. With an input of 91 volts and 178 amps, it can continuously deliver 19 horsepower at 5000 rpm. With an input of 86 volts and 322 amps, it can deliver 31.5 horsepower at 3600 rpm for about 5 minutes. Both of these ratings assume standard ambient temperature. Power generation is limited by heat. Maximum speed is about 8000 rpm, but high speed operation results in greatly increased brush wear.

Series wound motors are also known as traction motors since they can generate great torque at low speed. But only for a short time. Great torque requires great current which quickly heats the motor.

It should be noted, that comparing electric motors with gasoline engines is like comparing apples and oranges. Gasoline engines are rated at their peak power, and electric motors are rated at their continuous power. It is for this reason that a 30 hp electric motor will generally perform like a 50 hp gasoline engine in a same weight vehicle. Of course the addition of a large number of batteries will diminish the vehicle's ability to accelerate or climb hills.






GENERATOR



3 Phase Rotating magnetic field





ELECTRIC MOTOR





KITPLANES Magazine, April 2003
Electric Powered Aircraft - Part 3
Motor and propeller selection are the topics this time.
By James Dunn

This article is the third in a special multipart series. Part 1 (April '02) outlined the background and challenges involved in developing an electric-powered airplane and the overall significance of this challenging project. Part 2 (September '02) explained the approach used to select the ideal aircraft to electrify and the specifications of the candidate airframe selected for this project. This month's article covers the selection of the electric motor and propeller and explains the performance benefits and power available from a high-efficiency electric drive system.

Project Objectives

This project focuses on designing, building and testing a safe, practical two-place general aviation airplane powered by DC electricity from fuel cells and advanced rechargeable batteries. The airplane can take off, fly more than 250 miles on a singe charge, and land safely. This breakthrough project is being developed with special funding from NASA and the Foundation for Advancing Science and Technology Education (FASTec), a not-for-profit 501-c3 program. The charter is to explore new frontiers in science while educating our population on the benefits of advanced energy storage and transportation systems. If successful, this unique aircraft could create a new paradigm for future transportation technology, paving the way for the next century of flight. To demonstrate the feasibility and usefulness of electrically propelled aircraft, an existing light-weight, low-drag, carbon composite aircraft is being converted to electric propulsion, replacing the typical gasoline-powered internal-combustion (IC) engine with a special high-efficiency electric drive system with advanced controls and instruments. The electricity to power the aircraft will be provided by a bank of advanced high-energy rechargeable batteries, augmented in Phase II by a hydrogen-powered fuel cell to extend the range.

Why Electric Aircraft?

Electric-powered aircraft offer many benefits including dramatic improvements in reliability and safety, lower maintenance and total lifecycle costs, significant improvements in environmental compatibility (noise, emissions and fuel), improved performance, and improvements in ease of operation and passenger comfort. The biggest benefits are reliability and safety. With only one moving part (motor armature plus propeller), electrically powered aircraft should be far less susceptible to failure; there's not much to fail. Electric drive also offers significant improvements in performance. Initially, performance of conventional GA planes - particularly overall range - will be difficult to match.

But in terms of total available peak power per pound, electric motors have a huge benefit over gasoline-fueled engines. For a similar power rating, the electric motor can weigh significantly less than a comparable gasoline engine and produce significantly more peak power. This is due to the much higher operation efficiency and short term over-power potential of electric motors, allowing them to produce up to 300% of rated power for short durations, critical for takeoff, rapid climb and missed approaches. Electric motors will also offer dramatically better performance at altitude because they do not breathe air and don't suffer from loss of power at high altitude. The are also immune to carburetor icing and fuel contamination. The aircraft selected for conversion is a high-performance, all-carbon, two-place French DynAero Lafayette III provided by American Ghiles Aircraft in Dijon, France.

Motor Selection

To begin the propulsion system selection process, we established several basic objectives:

1.The primary goal was to match the performance of the standard gasoline-powered version of the Lafayette III Bushplane...still using a tractor-type drive configuration.

2.The second objective was to provide the highest level of total energy efficiency, providing the best performance, range and operating time, along with the least amount of electrical energy. This includes the combined efficiency of all components from the energy source (batteries) to the motor and propeller.

3.The third objective was to minimize the total weight of the propulsion system components because the energy source components will be significantly heavier than the gasoline and tanks it will be replacing. Total propulsion system and energy source weight is critical to range and payload.

4.The final objective was to select components that had already proven their reliability with a minimum of 50 units being successfully deployed in field applications. This is particularly important because the overall reliability and safety are the most important overall considerations in pioneering aviation projects like this.

Target Power Level. The normal engine of the target aircraft is a Rotax 912S, which produces 100 hp at 6500 rpm. The Lafayette III, however, is an extremely efficient design, providing exceptional performance with only 80 hp (130-knot cruise and 180-knot top speed). Because electric motors can typically produce significantly more power for short periods, we targeted the motor power level selection toward the optimum cruise power levers, knowing the motor has the ability to produce similar peak power levels to the Rotax 912 for takeoff and climbing flight. We also decided to look for a motor that would produce peak torque at low revs (1200-2700 rpm), thereby eliminating the need for reduction gearing

The 71 -hp brushless DC motor from UQM Technologies Corp., constant-speed Airmaster propeller system with Warp Drive blades is ready for further testing. that is typical of most Rotax engine installations. Eliminating the need for gears or belts and pulleys not only reduces the weight but also increases the overall reliability and efficiency of the electric propulsion system. Electric motors have a huge power density benefit over gasoline-fueled IC engines, particularly in terms of total peak power. Thus, for a similar power rating, an electric motor can weigh as little as 50% of the weight of a comparable gasoline engine, yet still produce significantly more peak power. This is due to the much higher operating efficiency and short-term over-power potential of electric motors. Electric motors are usually rated in kilowatts (kW); 1 hp= 746 W (or 1 kW =1.33 hp). Our target electric motor power level is 40-60kW (53-80 hp).

Efficiency. Electric motor technology is quite mature, with numerous high-efficiency brushless DC and AC induction motors currently available that should be suitable for aircraft applications. Most modern electric motors provide efficiencies of 80-95%, based upon the basic motor design approach. This is a dramatic contrast to the efficiency of most typical IC engines of only 18-23% (diesel engines provide much higher efficiencies of 27-36%, but still significantly lower than electric motors). Our target was to find a motor and controller combination that would provide at least 90% total combined efficiency over the target operating band of 1500-2700rpm (prop speed). Several basic motor design approaches were considered including both AC and DC designs. Weight. Although the Lafayette III has an extremely high empty-to-gross-weight range, we need to reserve as much weight capacity as possible for the energy source (batteries, fuel cell, and other system components) as time is the critical factor that will determine our useful range and payload. The total firewall-forward weight of the Rotax engine - complete with muffler and all peripheral equipment and gasoline tank - was estimated to be 165 pounds. As a rough rule of thumb, DC motors can produce approximately 1 hp per pound in the size range we were seeking (50-100 hp). After talking with a number of motor suppliers, we set a target weight goal of 110 pounds for the combined motor and controller (leaving 55 pounds for the heat-exchange system and instruments). The propeller was assumed to weigh approximately the same as similar propellers for gasoline-powered aircraft.

Budgeting Weight
The basic target weight breakdown for the E-plane is as follows:
Empty mass of airframe 345 lbs.
Motor/controller 110 lbs.
Propeller and hub 26 lbs.
Motor mount/heat exchange 22 lbs.
Batteries 330 lbs.
Instruments/equipment 33 lbs.
Total weight Figure 1. Basic System Components. 867 lbs.

Picking the Best

Several different motor technologies and design methods are used in industry including AC- and DC-powered design approaches. The most efficient designs typically use permanent magnets (instead of coils) in the stators. These require less energy to create the basic magnetic field, with permanent-magnet brushless DC motors usually being much more efficient than older brush-equipped designs. They also offer much higher reliability and virtually no maintenance. After reviewing several candidate motor designs, we decided that a brushless DC permanent-magnet (BDC-PM) design would be best suited for our application, rather than an induction, switched-reluctance, or other motor design configuration. Although brushless DC motors require a more sophisticated controller unit (typically a three-phase, pulse width-modulated [PWM]), total efficiency is typically 3-7% higher than brush-style motor. (Brushless motors replace the brushes and commutators with a controller that electronically switched the power to the coils, eliminating the brush and commutator wear and arcing). Brush-type motors were also eliminated from selection due to the use of hydrogen on board for the fuel cells and the risk of ignition from sparks produced by the brushes. After significant analysis, we created the following requirements for the electric motor:

Target Motor Specs
Motor type: Three-phase brushless DC permanent magnet motor (or AC Induction). Continuous power: 15-30 kW (20-40 hp) at prop shaft @ 1600-2200 rpm (direct drive). Climb power: 30-50 kW (40-67 hp) for 5 minutes at prop shaft @ 1800-2400 rpm. Maximum takeoff power: 45-70 kW peak (60-94 hp) for 1 min. @ 2400-2800 rpm prop speed. Maximum torque: 240 Nm from 1200-2700 rpm (torque vs. rpm is flexible with a variable-pitch prop, but high torque at low rpm is important). Target weight: 110 lb. total for motor, controller (+ gearbox, if needed). Operating Voltage: 200-350 VDC (operating voltage bus target = 270 VDC). Motor efficiency: 90-95% over operating range from 15-70 kW. Total drive system efficiency: 85-90% overall including loss in controller, motor (and gearbox, if needed). Cooling system: Oil, water or air (typical radiator and pump). Motor size: Diameter less than 12 in., length less than 15 in. preferable. Controller size: Less than 1 cu. ft., and less than 30 lb.

The Gang of 12

A study was done of available motors that met the target requirements, and a total of 12 motor candidates were analyzed with the help of Solectria Corp. in Woburn, Massachusetts. Nine motor manufacturers considered were AC Propulsion, Fisher Electrical, GE, Kollmorgen, Lynx Motion Technology, Solectria, Technologies M4, UQM Technologies, and Zytek. Of the 12 candidate motors, only three suppliers appeared to come close to meeting the target requirements. They were Technologies M4

Here are close-ups of the UQM Tech EV 53 motor and CD40-400L controller. of Toronto, Zytek of the U.K., and UQM Technologies of Golden, Colorado.
The best candidates from the three key suppliers were the Zytek PM4.2 60-kW BDC liquid-cooled motor with an MC6.2 controller; Technologies M4-B2R-670 Drive system using a 75-kW induction type; and the UQM Technologies Corp. Caliber EV53 53-kW BDC motor with a CD40- 400 controller.
The final motor selected was the EV218 53-kW (71 hp) brushless DC motor from UQM Technologies Corp. This motor offered the best overall fit with our requirements. It has been used in a wide range of electric vehicles and other demanding applications. The only drawback of high-performance motors is the cost, due primarily to the relatively low-volume production. If produced in high volumes, motors like this should cost no more than $3000, versus about $15,000 currently.

Propeller Selection

Objectives. The propeller for the electric drive should meet or exceed the performance of the normal recommended propeller for our AGA airframe: an MT three-blade prop made in Germany.
1. The main objective was to optimize the propeller efficiency and suitability for use with direct electric motor drive. Because the electric motor selected produced optimum torque at low rpm (in the 1000-2500 rpm range), direct drive was possible, eliminating the need for speed reduction.
2. The ideal application with the most operating flexibility should provide the means to operate as a variable-pitch prop, or in constant-speed mode, with a control system that allows the pilot the option of setting the prop pitch to a specific setting or using the constant-speed option (maintaining a fixed propeller speed).
3. An electrically actuated propeller was required as our aircraft has no hydraulic or vacuum system.
4. Propeller system weight should be kept to a minimum, ideally under 20 pounds.
The candidates included MT, Airmaster, Warp Drive and Ivoprop. (Other manufacturers may also offer suitable props, but these were the candidates suggested by the aircraft manufacturer.)
Although all of the propeller choices offered benefits, the Airmaster AP332, a high-quality, electrically operated constant-speed propeller system, was selected for several reasons.
1. The Airmaster AP332 propeller has demonstrated good performance on a wide range of aircraft with engines in a similar power range to ours. These aircraft included several high-performance aircraft in the same class as the Lafayette, most notably the Europa. (See the applications part of the Airmaster web-site http://www.propeller.com/.)
2. The Airmaster propeller is also fully feathering with a consequent large pitch range. This feature seemed of interest as it could allow for future investigation of using the windmilling propeller to provide regenerative power generation on descent.
3. The Airmaster AP332 propeller control system has extremely low power consumption; only about 1A current is drawn while the propeller is changing pitch (a couple of

Figure 2. Motor-prop adaptor assembly.
seconds occasionally), which is significantly less than most other electric hubs.

4. The Airmaster AC200 electronic constant-speed controller is completely configurable by the operator. This means that with simple programming, you have complete control over the preset speeds programmed into the controller. Using the Auto/Manual mode, the pilot also has the option of selecting specific pitch settings to quickly match the electric motor output and propeller performance for specific predefined flight modes.
5. Airmaster uses Warp Drive composite blades providing a high-aspect-ratio blade platform. Warp Drive propellers are built using an all-carbon-fiber matrix. No foam, fiberglass or gelcoat is used in these blades. The structural, performance and practical advantages of a carbon propeller over any fiberglass, wood or metal prop are many, including superior strength, light weight, and (we hope) a longer useful life. The construction of Warp Drive's blades allows for simple repair of basic nicks and gouges, and the blades are individually replaceable. We determined this to be the best blade platform for the aircraft, motor power, prop diameter (68 inches) and target airspeed range.
Airmaster Propellers Ltd. has supported our project greatly, even providing a propeller at no cost. The company sees the advanced technology of its propeller systems as a good match to the ground-breaking technology focus of our project.

Prop Adaptor and Mounting

To minimize mechanical losses, it was determined that the propeller should ideally be connected directly to the motor shaft, eliminating the complexity of gears, belts and pulleys. This was accomplished by designing a special propeller adaptor assembly. (See Figure 2.) The propeller adaptor assembly includes 10 machined parts plus mounting bolts.
The total combined propulsion system efficiency was optimized with the UQM Technologies motor directly driving the Airmaster propeller, with no losses to gearing or belt reduction systems. The total aircraft reliability is also enhanced with fewer parts to fail. Although this specific propulsion system offers an extremely high total overall operating efficiency, there are several other configurations that could also provide suitable performance for this unique application.

What's Next?

Picking the energy source to power the electric drive will be the topic next time. The airplane has begun first taxi tests using batteries not intended for flight. First flights with airworthy batteries are expected in a few months.

James Dunn is president of Advanced Technology Products, Inc. and vice president of CTC/FASTec. He is currently involved in the development of a piloted electric aircraft. For more information, contact him at CTC, 1400 Computer Dr., Westborough, MA 01581; e-mail jdunn@ctc.org. Track the fuel-cell project on the web at http://www.aviationtomorrow.com/. The electric airplane project won Dunn's organization a 2002 Technical Innovation award from Aviation Week & Space Technology magazine.






Sally, from the movie, Cars

Sally, from the movie, Cars



a 1 or 2 month sample:


The safest web sites are viewed
best with trusted browsers


FEDERAL EXPERTS SUGGEST DITCHING INTERNET EXPLORER

  Home News Electric cars Future Denied Super Carburetors WG's Magnet Motor build a Hydrogen generator  
  Tesla Roadster Electric Motors Dennis Lee Books on Super Carbs HJ's Magnet Motor Pacheco Hydrogen generator  
  blog Dark Energy Hybrids Oil News Tech.Improvments Battery & Solar Pwr Hydrogen Generators pgmr  


275822
 
  Your IP address currently is   38.103.63.60