{"id":1320,"date":"2014-05-20T01:50:18","date_gmt":"2014-05-20T05:50:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/fuel-efficient-vehicles.org\/energy-news\/?page_id=1320"},"modified":"2024-09-07T10:07:59","modified_gmt":"2024-09-07T14:07:59","slug":"teslas-lost-manuscript","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/fuel-efficient-vehicles.org\/energy-news\/?page_id=1320","title":{"rendered":"Tesla&#8217;s Unk. Manuscript"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>(Manuscript discovered prior to 2009?)<\/p>\n<h1 align=center> The Unknown Tesla Manuscript <\/h1>\n<h2 align=center> <b>  Proof of the Ether  <\/b> <\/h2>\n<h3 align=center> The 1908 Tunguska Event <\/h3>\n<p>  <b> Unknown Manuscript of Nikola Tesla by Mikhail Shapkin <\/b> <\/p>\n<p>FarShores Note: This is a new and more complete version of the unknown &#8216;Tesla&#8217; manuscript, transcribed and translated into English by Mikhail using computer software. It replaces the original copy consisting only of Part 1. Editing has been kept to a absolute minimum in order to improve ease of reading in some sections only.<\/p>\n<p> <b> Introduction <\/b><br \/>\nThis manuscript has been loaned to me by my acquaintance. During his stay in the USA he bought an old fire-helmet, which was on sale in the streets of New York. There was an old writing book inside this helmet, apparently used as a lining. The writing book had thin and partially burned covers producing the smell of mould. All its yellowing sheets were full of notes written in ink faded under the influence of time. In parts the ink has lost its color to such a degree that some of the letters can only be guessed at on the yellowed paper. In other places, large parts of the text have been completely spoiled by water, having been transformed into white ink stains. In addition, all the sheets have been burned on the edges and as a result some words are irretrievably lost.<\/p>\n<p>I own a computer and therefore it was not difficult to translate this manuscript. Right after it was translated I understood that it belonged to famous inventor, Nikola Tesla, who lived and worked in the USA. There has been a lot of work done to put the translated text into final form. Those who have dealt with computer translation software will understand me entirely. I had many problems arising from the lost words and sentences. I could never understand many minor but probably very important details of the manuscript. I hope, however, this manuscript will open some mysteries of history and the universe. &#8230;.<\/p>\n<p> &nbsp; <\/p>\n<h2> Part 1. You are wrong, Mr. Einstein &#8211; ether does exist! <\/h2>\n<p>They say much about the Einstein&#8217;s theory now. According to Einstein the ether does not exist and many people agree with him. But it is a mistake in my opinion. Ether&#8217;s opponents refer to the experiments of Maykelson \u2013 Morli who made attempts to detect the Earth&#8217;s movement relative to the fixed-bed ether. These experiments failed, however it didn&#8217;t mean the ether&#8217;s non-existence. I always based as fact the existence of mechanical ether in my works and therefore I could achieve positive success.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\"  class=imgleft  width=210 height=350  src=\"images\/pages\/Tesla-quote-non-phsical-s.jpg\" title=\"Tesla-quote-study-non-phsical-events\" \/>   What is the ether and why is it so difficult to detect it? I reflected on this matter for a seriously long time and here are the outcomes I have been led to: I think that all the contradictions about whether the ether exists or not are the result of wrong interpretation of ether&#8217;s properties. The ether has always been presented as an aeroform environment. That was the essential mistake. The ether has a very strong density. It is known that of more dense a substance, the higher is the speed of wave propagation within it. When comparing acoustic speed in the air and the light speed I have drawn a conclusion that ether density is several thousand times higher than air density. It is not the ether that is aeroform but the material world is an aeroform to the ether! But as the ether is electrically neutral it very poorly interacts with the material world. Notwithstanding that poor interaction we still can feel the ether&#8217;s existence.<\/p>\n<p>A good example for such an interaction becomes apparent in gravitation, which should rather be named universal compression. I think the material bodies do not gravitate between each other but it is the ether that makes one material body to press to another. We wrongly call this phenomena gravitation. We can also feel ether&#8217;s reaction when sudden acceleration or braking. The stars, planets and all the universe appeared from the ether when some part of it, due to certain reasons, became less dense. It can be compared with formation of blebs [air bubbles] in boiling water although such a comparison is only rough. The ether tries to return itself to its initial state by compressing our world, but intrinsic electric charge within material the world substance obstructs this. It is similar to that when the water compresses blebs filled with hot water steam. Until the steam does get cold the water is unable to compress the bleb. With time, having lost the intrinsic electric charge, our world will be compressed with the ether and is going to turn into ether. Having come out of the ether once &#8211; so it will go back into the ether.<\/p>\n<p>Density of substance of material world strongly differs from the density and physical properties of the ether. Therefore, the ether cannot remain in a fixed-bed state around material bodies and under certain circumstances there will be an ether whirlwind appearing around material bodies. Hence, we can explain the reason for failure of the Maykelson &#8211; Morli experiment.<\/p>\n<p>In order to understand it let&#8217;s carry the experiment over to a water environment. Try to imagine that our boat is twirled within a huge whirlpool. We will try to detect water motion relatively to the boat. We will not find any movement as the speed of the boat will be equal to the rate of water movement. In our imagination let&#8217;s replace the boat with the Earth, and the whirlpool \u2013 by ether whirlwind, which revolves around the Sun. The example shows clearly that when on the Earth one can not detect the Earth&#8217;s movement relatively to the ether as the rate of Earth&#8217;s movement will be equal to the rate of ether movement. In my researches I always adhere the principle that all nature&#8217;s phenomena show themselves equally whichever physical environment they would happen in. The waves exist in the water, air, &#8230; and radio\u2013waves and the light is the waves in the ether.<\/p>\n<p>Einstein&#8217;s assertion of non-existence of the ether is erroneous. It is difficult to imagine radio-wave and light transmission without ether. Einstein says that there is no ether and at the same time, practically he proves its existence. For example, let&#8217;s consider the speed of the passage of light. Einstein states that the velocity of light does not depend on the rate of movement of the light source. It&#8217;s correct. But this principle can exist only when the light source is in a certain physical environment (ether), which cuts down velocity of light due to its properties. Ether&#8217;s substance cuts down the velocity of light in the same way as air substance cuts down the acoustic speed. If the ether did not exist then velocity of light would strongly depend on the rate of movement of the light source.<\/p>\n<p> Having clarified what is the ether is I began to compare phenomena occurring in the water, air and ether. And here an opportunity occurred to help me in my researches. Once I saw to a sailor who was smoking a pipe. He was exhaling smoke in the form of little rings. Smoke rings flew pretty far away before they got broken. Then I investigated this phenomena in the water. I took a metal jar and carved out a small vent on one side and pulled on thin leather on another side. I poured some ink into the jar and lowered it onto a pool. When harshly hit the leather ink-rings flew out of the jar crossing over the pool and got broken having bumped into its wall, producing substantial motions of water at the pool&#8217;s wall. At the same time, the water in the pool kept being quiet. &#8211; &#8220;This method can be used to transfer energy&#8221;, &#8230; <\/p>\n<p>I understand what is ball lightning and how to transfer energy long range without using wires. Einstein tries to explain light movement when no ether environment by Plank quantum hypothesis. Will Einstein be able to explain ball lightning phenomena when without the existence of ether? There is no possibility of explaining ball lightning phenomena without ether!<\/p>\n<p>Based on these investigations I have constructed a generator, which could generate ether vortical [vortice? G-fs] rings, which I called ether vortical objects. It was my achievement. I was in euphoria. It seemed to me like I could do everything. I promised the world not having completely studied this phenomena and took severe punishment for that. I was not financed any more but what the most unpleasant thing was that I was not trusted anymore. The Euphoria has changed to deep depression. And I dared to start my crazy experiment then.<\/p>\n<p>  <b> Part 2. I will keep the secret of my invention until I die <\/b>  <\/p>\n<p>After my failures I became more self-restrained in making promises&#8230; During my work with ether vortical objects I understood that they behave not in the manner I thought before. It turned out that when vortical objects passed near metal objects they lost their energy and collapsed, sometimes exploding. Deep Earth layers have absorbed their energy as strongly as the metal did. So, I could transmit energy only within small distances. I paid attention to the Moon then. If ether vortical objects are sent to the Moon, they will return back to the Earth very far from the transmitter, having been reflected from electrostatic field. As the hade[?] is equal to the angle of reflection, then energy could be transmitted over very long distances, even to other parts of the Earth.<\/p>\n<p>I carried out several experiments transmitting energy towards the Moon. Through these experiments I discovered that the Earth is surrounded by an electric field. This field kept destroying faint ether vortical objects. Ether vortical objects possessing big energy, burst through electric field of the Earth and extended into interplanetary space. And right here, the idea came to my mind that if I can create a resonance system between the Earth and the Moon, then power of the transmitter may be very small while the energy derived out of this system could be considerable. Having made the calculations on how much energy can be derived I was surprised at it. The calculations showed that the energy derived from this system is enough to fully destroy a big city. For the first time at that moment I realized that my system could represent a danger for the mankind. However, I still greatly wanted to carry out my experiment.<\/p>\n<p>Secretly, from everyone, I began to thoroughly prepare my crazy experiment. First of all, I needed to select the place for my experiment. The Arctic Zone did the best location for it. There were no people there and I would injure no-one. But the calculation showed that with the Moon being at its present position, the ether vortical object could strike Siberia, but people live there. I went to the library and began to study the information concerning Siberia. The information was very small but, however, I saw that there are almost no people in Siberia. I should keep my experiment a deep secret, otherwise the consequences could prove to be very unpleasant for me and for all mankind. I always worry about one question: &#8216;Will my discoveries be for the good of the people?&#8217; Because it had been known for a long time that the people used all inventions to extirpate the similar ones. The fact that much of my equipment in my laboratory has been dismantled to that moment considerably contributed to keeping my secret. However, I could save the equipment I required for my experiment.<br \/>\n      <img decoding=\"async\"  class=imgright  width=420 height=275  src=\"images\/pages\/Tunguska-Ru-map-1908.jpg\"><br \/>\nI alone assembled a new transmitter out of this equipment and connected it up to the emitter. The experiment with such a big quantity of energy could be very dangerous. If I made a mistake in my calculations the energy of ether vortical object would strike astern. That&#8217;s why I was not in the laboratory but two miles outside it. The work of my installation had been operating by clockwork. The principle of the experiment was rather simple. In order to better understand its principle it is necessary to grasp first what are the ether vortical object and ball lightning. Basically, they are the same. The only difference is that the ball lightning is a visible ether object. Visibility of ball lightning is provided by fluorescence of charged air particles. It could be compared with ink coloring of water vortical particles in my experiment in the pool.<\/p>\n<p>In order to create a resonant Earth \u2013 Moon system it was necessary to create a concentration of charged particles between the Earth and the Moon. For that, I used a property of ether vortical objects to capture and transfer charged particles. The generator has emanated the ether vortical objects towards the Moon. When passing through the electric field of the Earth, ether vortical objects have captured charged particles within it. As an electrostatic field of the Moon has the same polarity as an electric field of the Earth, the ether vortical objects have been reflected from it and this time, again returned to the Earth at another angle. After returning to the Earth the ether vortical objects have been reflected again by electric field of the Earth back to the Moon &#8230; That was the way, by which the Earth &#8211; Moon resonant system has been occupied by charged particles. When the required concentration of charge particles in resonant Earth &#8211; Moon system was achieved it has been energized itself at its own resonant frequency. The energy million times assisted by resonance properties of the system was being changed into ether vortical object of a huge power within the electric field of the Earth. However, it was only my guesswork, and I didn&#8217;t know how it would be in reality.<br \/>\n          <img decoding=\"async\" class=imgleft src=\"images\/pages\/Tunguska-Russia-1908-blast-photo.png\"><br \/>\nI remember very well the day of experiment. The estimated time came near. Minutes dragged on so slowly and seemed as if they were years. I thought I would go crazy of this waiting. At last, the estimated time came and &#8230; nothing happened! Another five minutes passed but nothing unusual took place. Various theories came into my head: maybe the clockwork hasn&#8217;t worked, or the system hasn&#8217;t snapped into action, and maybe nothing must happen at all. I was on the verge of insanity. And suddenly &#8230; It seemed to me that the light has grown dark for a moment and a strange feeling was being sensed throughout all my body &#8211; as if thousands of needles were piercing my body. Soon everything was over but there was an unpleasant metallic after-taste left in my mouth. All my muscles had become relaxed and there was a buzzing in my head. I felt totally worn out.<\/p>\n<p>When I returned to my laboratory I found that it was practically intact, just there was a strong smell of burning in the air&#8230; And again, agonizing suspense had seized me, as I didn&#8217;t know the results of my experiment. And only later on, having read about unusual phenomena in the newspapers, did I realize what a dreadful arm I have created. Of course, I expected that it would be a very heavy explosion. But, it has not been even an explosion &#8211; it has been a catastrophe!<\/p>\n<p>After that experiment I determined that I would keep the secret of my invention until I die. Of course, I knew that someone else could easily repeat this crazy experiment. But this would require the acknowledgement that the ether exists but our scientific world moves further and further away from the truth. I am even grateful to Einstein and others because through their erroneous theories they lead mankind away from that dangerous path I followed. And, probably, this is their only merit. Perhaps, in about one hundred years, when reason prevails over the brute, my invention will serve for welfare of people.<\/p>\n<p> <b>  Part 3. Flying machine  <\/b> <\/p>\n<p>My hypothesis that gravitation is a compression of material bodies by ether has recently been confirmed experimentally. When working with the generator of ether vortical objects I observed one very odd phenomena. When it&#8217;s turned on I could feel a wind blowing towards the generator. I decided to investigate this phenomena. I rolled up several newspapers before igniting and immediately extinguishing them. There was a thick smoke coming from newspapers. With these reeky newspapers I went around the generator. The smoke came to the generator from any spot of the laboratory. And the smoke disappeared near to the generator. At first, I thought the reason relates to electrostatics. But having considered this phenomena I concluded: electrostatics could not be able to cause these phenomena at such a long distance from the generator. Then I supposed: &#8211; the Generator lessens the compression of ether through impact to the ether (gravity) !<\/p>\n<p>I constructed big scales to make sure of it. One side of the scales was positioned over the generator. In order to exclude any electromagnetic influence of the generator the scales were made out of highly dried wood. In order to protect against electrostatic field of the generator the scales were worked up by graphite powder. After I accurately balanced the scales I turned on the generator. The side of scales that was over the generator began rapidly to go up. I turned on the generator. The scales went down. I turned off the generator. The scales went down and began to swing until it was fully balanced out. I loaded the scales with the ballast and changed its capacity and operating mode striving for its balance. After these experiments I planned to build a flying machine, which could fly not only in the air but within interplanetary space.<\/p>\n<p>The principle of operation of the flying machine is as follows: towards the flight direction, compression of the ether is to become weaker by the generator installed in the flying machine. As the ether keeps pressing with prior intensity from all other sides, then the flying machine began moving. Being within this flying machine you will not feel its speeding-up as the ether is not to hamper your movement. I had to abandon my plans to create the flying machine. There were two reasons for it: first, I have no money to work in secret. But the main reason is that the great war began in Europe and I wouldn&#8217;t like my inventions used to kill! When on earth will these madmen stop?<\/p>\n<p> &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>  <b> Postscript. <\/b>   <\/p>\n<p>You read a brief version of the manuscript of Nicola Tesla. This manuscript version is aimed at a broad audience, therefore there are no details in it understandable only to the specialists. You shouldn&#8217;t search for any style similarity of Tesla&#8217;s entry with his other known documents in this manuscript version. You shouldn&#8217;t forget that this manuscript has been translated by computer, and besides that the condition of the notebook was very bad. However, I tried to convey the main point of Tesla&#8217;s notes with the utmost accuracy. Unfortunately, there was a great deal of damage through water effect of that manuscript passage where the generator of ether vortical objects was described. But, nevertheless, from these scraps of data I could understand the principle of work of this generator. However, there is a shortage of several details to have an entire representation.<\/p>\n<p>In Tesla&#8217;s manuscript there is information about the biological impact of metal rings to animate nature. There is a way of processing metal wire by alternative current provided in this part of the manuscript. After such processing the metal wire is stranded into a circle designed to kill microbes and protect people against diseases. I tried this method myself. As a result, I didn&#8217;t get ill with flu during the last two winters, although I had a flu very often before.<\/p>\n<p>In the unknown manuscript of Nicola Tesla there is the following phrase: &#8211; The light moves in straight lines, the ether \u2013 around the circle so the leaps arise hereby. \u2013 Apparently, by using this phrase, Tesla tried to explain why the light moves by leaps. In modern physics this phenomena is called a quantum leap. Further in the manuscript there is an explanation of this phenomena but it is a little fuzzy. So I will present my reconstruction of the explanation of this phenomena out of conserved words and sentences.<\/p>\n<p>In order to better understand the reason of leap light movement let&#8217;s imagine the boat spinning within a huge whirlpool. We will install the generator in this boat. As the rate of movement of external and internal areas of the whirlpool is different then the waves from the generator will move by leaps when passing these areas. The same phenomena we can observe with the light when it passes ether whirlwind. There is a description of the principle of getting energy using ether vortical objects in the manuscript. But it also was greatly damaged by the water. That&#8217;s why I will present my own reconstruction of the text. This reconstruction is based on separate words and phrases of the unknown manuscript, as well as in other publications of Nicola Tesla. Therefore, I cannot guarantee exact coincidence of the manuscript text reconstruction to the original.<\/p>\n<p>To understand the method of receiving energy with use of ether vortical objects let&#8217;s imagine a huge bleb swimming in the water. This bleb is very stable as it is squeezed by the water from every quarter and it is influenced by the force of radial compression. How can we extract the energy out of this bleb? For this we have to break its stability. It can be done by water whirlwind or if the bleb&#8217;s side will be hit by water vortical ring. If using ether vortical object we carry out the same thing with any material body and the result is we will get huge surge of energy. I will present an example: when ball lightning touches any object the result is a huge energy liberation and sometimes an explosion.<\/p>\n<p>Mikhail Shapkin<br \/>\nTashkent, Uzbekistan<br \/>\n700125 p\/o 3146<br \/>\nmikesh@albatros.uz<\/p>\n<p> &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>from  <a href=\"http:\/\/worldtracker.org\/media\/library\/Free%20Energy\/tesla\/Web%20Pages%20(archived)\/Farshores%20World%20Mysteries%20Article%20Unknown%20Manuscript%20of%20Nikola%20Tesla%20by%20Mikhail%20Shapkin.htm\"> worldtracker.org\/media\/library\/Free Energy\/tesla\/Web . . . <\/a><\/p>\n<p> &nbsp; <\/p>\n<hr>\n<p> &nbsp; <\/p>\n<aside>\n<h3 align=center> The Enigma of Tunguska <\/h3>\n<p>&#8220;Some of the local residents were witnesses of Tunguska ( the Vainshtein&#8217;s article in Russian is here: http:\/\/www.nkj.ru\/archive\/articles\/14336\/ ). In brief: the witnesses stated that the anomalous skyglow commenced approximately 2 days before Tunguska! Vainshtein informed some scientists who studied Tunguska about the accounts after his return to Moscow, but the scientists did not believe them as the accounts contradict the meteorite-fall [theory].<\/p>\n<p>  <img decoding=\"async\"  class=imgright src=\"images\/pages\/Tunguska-event-Epicenter.jpg\" title=\"Tunguska-event-Epicenter\" \/>    <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Scientists recorded the occurrence of some unusual phenomena starting on June 27th, 1908.  Some specialists even suppose that these phenomena started as early as June 23 or June 21&#8230; Optical anomalies in the atmosphere (strange silvery clouds, brilliant twilights, and intense solar halos) were observed in western Europe, the European part of Russia, and western Siberia. &#8230; William F. Denning, a noted British specialist in meteors, wrote in <i> Nature <\/i> in 1908 that on the night of June 30, the firmament over Bristol was unusually light and few stars could be seen. The whole northern part of the sky was red-colored, while the eastern part looked green. ^The anomalies increased in intensity during the three days prior to the sunny morning of June 30, 1908 &#8230;&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>June 30, 2008, and it&#8217;s just after seven in the morning. A man is sitting on the front porch of a trading post at Vanavara in Siberia. Little does he know, in a few moments, he will be hurled from his chair and the heat will be so intense he will feel as though his shirt is on fire.<br \/>\nThat&#8217;s how the Tunguska event felt 40 miles from ground zero.<\/p>\n<p>Eight hundred square miles of remote forest had been ripped asunder. Eighty million trees were on their sides, lying in a radial pattern.<br \/>\n&#8211; NASA<\/p>\n<p>Remarkably, that even supporters of the &#8220;meteorite fall&#8221; have to recognize that practically nobody of numerous witnesses saw any trail left by the &#8220;Tunguska fireball&#8221;&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>On the basis of the eyewitness&#8217;s accounts, three probable trajectories of the &#8220;Tunguska spacebody flight&#8221; were reconstructed (see also above). The first one was southern i.e. the meteorite flight from the south to the north (proposed and supported by Voznesenskii A., Kulik L. and Astapovich I. since 1920-s). Then in 1949 Krinov Ye. put forward the southeastern trajectory. Finally in the early 1960-s the eastern trajectory was proposed based on eyewitness accounts as well as on a pattern of the forest fall. Clearly, the meteorite could not have come from so many directions!<\/p>\n<p>Many researchers seeing the failure of asteroid\/comet interpretation proposed other ideas: a &#8220;black hole&#8221;, an &#8220;antimatter bullet&#8221;, a &#8220;mirror matter&#8221; asteroid, and, of course, UFO (the latter one is, no doubt, the most correct: indeed the event was related with some &#8220;unindentified flying object&#8221;, or  &#8220;objects&#8221; . . . <\/p>\n<p>Nizshne-Karelinskoye (465 km, 133). Extremely bright (it was impossible to look at it) luminous body was seen rather high in the north-western sky soon after 8 a.m. It looked like a tube (cylinder) and for 10 minutes moved down to the ground. The sky was clear, but only in the side, where the body was seen, a small dark cloud was present low above the horizon. While coming to the ground, the body dispersed (flattened) and at this place a large puff of black smoke appeared. Then a flame emanated from this cloud.<\/p>\n<p>Nizshne-Ilimskoye (419 km, 168). The fireball was seen which while going to the ground at first flattened into &#8216;flying saucer&#8217;. Then coming nearer to the ground it transformed into 2 fire columns.<\/p>\n<p>Os&#8217;kino (330 km, 89). Innokentii Farkov said a gradually rising boom coming from afar was heard since morning hours. The old men, thinking their dying hours had come, were changing into clean shirts, and one of them even washed in the bath house to meet the death clean. The ground trembled as a black body flew past, trailing a fiery tail.<\/p>\n<p>Kezhma (214 km, 193). This settlement is a good example to demonstrate the strange (for the meteoritic interpretation) property of the Tunguska accounts: as usually different luminous phenomena were reported by different eyewitnesses from the same place. In Kezhma they were: a flying luminous cloud, multicolored luminous bands, a fireball, a flame over the northern horizon. For example, Kokorin A. K., the observer of the Kezhma meteorological station marked in the observational register (pay attention to EVIDENTLY HIGH TRUSTWORTHINESS of this information!) that at 7 a.m. two giant fiery circles appeared on the north. They persisted for 4 minutes and then disappeared. Soon after, noise, like a wind was heard. It came from the north to the south and its duration was 5 minutes. Then other sounds, resembling large cannon shots and crackling appeared. Windows trembled. These shots continued for 2 minutes, then a crackling like a gun shot appeared and persisted for 2 minutes. The sky was clear.<\/p>\n<p>Tetere (92 km, 165). Fire columns were seen in the north.<\/p>\n<p>Vanavara (65 km, 161). Nobody saw any fireball. A bright flame shooting up from the north horizon was seen.<\/p>\n<p>The eyewitness&#8217;s accounts are hardly conformed with the meteorite fall. Even just in a few days-weeks after the event different time was given by different people, from early morning to the afternoon. So was the duration &#8211; from a few minutes to an hour. Astronomer Yevgenii Krinov, writing in his book &#8220;The Tunguska meteorite&#8221; published in 1949, about this side of evidence frequently uses phrases like, &#8220;the eyewitnesses either confused the cardinal points or just forgot the details&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>All researchers noted, however, that the stories told by the local Evenks sounded true and were nearly always confirmed by other evidences later. The following story was typical for the area close to the epicenter. Two Evenk brothers, Chuchancha and Chekaren, sleeping in their tent (tepee) were suddenly awaken by shaking. They heard whistling sounds and &#8220;sensed a strong wind&#8221;. One of them was pushed so heavily that his head struck a supporting pole and he fell on the hot embers in the fire-place. From outside came a hideous noise and sounds of trees falling. The brothers were about to dash out of the tent when a deafening thunderbolt clapped. The ground started to tremble and sway, and, a ferocious gust of wind toppled the tent. One of the men saw from under the immobilizing poles falling trees, their branches set on fire, and the dry unbrushed and moss burning. All the place was wrapped in smoke and it was so hot the brothers feared they &#8220;could be grilled alive&#8221;. Suddenly a bright lightning flashed over the hill, as if another sun suddenly went up, and a series of thunderclaps followed immediately. Several more &#8220;lightning&#8221; flashes and claps of thunder, and the frightening sounds look like fading.<\/p>\n<p>Evenk woman, Akulina, who was together with several Evenks in a tent (36 km, 121) said that suddenly &#8220;somebody strongly pushed our tent&#8221;. Then it repeated again, and they fell on the ground. A loud noise came from outside, &#8220;somebody rattled and knocked the tent&#8217;s cover&#8221;. Suddenly bright light appeared, the bright sun was shining, strong wind was blowing&#8221;. After &#8220;somebody fired (shot) and at once a whirlwind arrived&#8221;. Akulina was frightened and lost consciousness. When she saw as a whirlwind &#8220;danced&#8221;, she recovered. The whirlwind put her down. When she looked at the forest, she saw stems without branches and leaves. Many trees were put down. Wood bedding was burning. Ivan, her husband was thrown about 40 meters, his arm was broken and soon after he died (the another Evenk, who was in the tent told the same story, being interrogated independently).<\/p>\n<p>Evenk, Ul&#8217;kigo (56 km, 176) said that suddenly in the early morning dogs began to howl, and small children cried. The persons inside the tent felt that &#8220;somebody began to knock the ground below them and to swing a tent&#8221;. When Ul&#8217;kigo got out from the sleeping bag and began to put the clothes on, &#8220;somebody pushed the earth strongly&#8221; (right before it, &#8220;somebody fired from a gun a lot&#8221;). Suddenly again &#8220;just like somebody hit the earth&#8221;. Utensils fell inside the tent. A loud thunderclap followed. When Ul&#8217;kigo got out from the tent, and looked at the sky, he suddenly saw a bright flash on the clear sky with following thunderclap. Ul&#8217;kigo was so frightened that he fell on the ground. He saw as wind put down trees and burning dry wood bedding. After Ul&#8217;kigo stood up, a whirlwind struck. The knocking, smoke and thunderclaps continued for some time.<\/p>\n<p>Other eyewitnesses from the epicentral area gave similar reports. What has all that to do with the meteorite fall? Many other eyewitnesses also reported about luminous phenomena ( columns, stripes, lightning, flame, red sky glowing, etc.) which hardly resembled the meteorite fall.<\/p>\n<p>Since mid-1960s numerous attempts were conducted to numerously stimulate the forest fall by a meteoroid explosion (disintegration, to be exact). One of the most detailed one was by Victor Korobeinikov, corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, with co-workers at the Academy&#8217;s Computer Center. Their results are very remarkable in several aspects.<br \/>\nFirst they have determined that to produce the tree-fall, an altitude of maximum energy output (caused by meteoroid&#8217;s disintegration and the follow-up aerobraking) of the hypothetical cosmic body (roughly speaking, the &#8220;explosion&#8221; altitude) would be about 6-7 km (see picture 6 of their large article in: SLEDY KOSMICHESKIKH VOZDEISTVII NA ZEMLYU; Novosibirsk, 1990, Nauka, p.69.). But we know from large observational data-set that even much smaller meteoroids disintegrate much higher in the atmosphere.<\/p>\n<p>But, as it will be shown below, even a proposal that the Tunguska was caused by some unusually strong exotic cosmic body would not help to explain the forest fall.<br \/>\nIt is based on the fact that the Tunguska spacebody explosion stimulation undertaken by Victor Korobeinikov with his co-workers has shown the internal energy of the spacebody to be commensurate with its kinetic energy to produce the existent forest fall (otherwise the hypothetical meteoroid could not &#8220;explode&#8221; switfly enough)[6]. In plain language, this means that the Tunguska meteorite had to be an enormous block of super-explosive!<\/p>\n<p>Moreover, it&#8217;s possible to demonstrate that from the Korobeinikov&#8217;s calculations the explosion of the hypothetical Tunguska body must be practically completely due to its internal energy! It&#8217;s because the shape of the treefall reveals the presence of a significant spherical component of the air-shock wave. But due to the law of a conservation of a momentum, the explosion due to a kinetic energy don&#8217;t produce a spherical air-shock wave ( a total momentum of a spherical air-shock wave is zero, while the total momentum of the bolide&#8217;s generated air-shock waves is qual to the momentum of the disintegrating meteorite). By the way, it is a strong argument against modelling a meteoroid disintegration (&#8220;explosion&#8221;) by a method of &#8220;equivalent charge&#8221;, i.e by exploding (really or numerally) a charge (this method is often used for simplicity).<br \/>\nThe absence of the spherical component is clearly seen on Fig.4 of work [7]. In there the air-shock wave of the &#8220;Tunguska meteorite&#8221; ( the latter is at 3 km\/s speed, i.e. practically already transferred all his momentum to air-shock waves) is as must be &#8211; the conical one, which can&#8217;t produce the shape of the Tunguska forest fall!<\/p>\n<p>Recently published detailed calculations of the hypothesized &#8220;Tunguska space body&#8221; completely confirm the idea about the conical shock wave. Thus in [MATEMATICHESKOE MODELIROVANIE, 1999, v.11, No.10, p.49 (in Russ.) ] an attempt was made to model disintegration of a comet with diameter 60 meters, speed 20 km\/s, inclination of a trajectory 45 degrees (imitating Tunguska).<br \/>\nIn the article initial height of the comet disintergation was evaluated as 21 km (in my opinion too low). They model the situation, as if the comet evaporates in this point at once. Then they calculated how the debris (gas) cloud moves farther to the ground.<br \/>\nTheir results are very remarkable. First, they got (as I stated for a long time) that the air-shock wave produced by the moving cloud is conical one, but not a spherical one.<br \/>\nBut their another result is possibly even more important. They got the following data of the air-shock wave just before reaching the ground (at 1.7 km height): speed 3.5 km\/s; typical transverse dimension &#8211; 2 km, pressure &#8211; 40 bars. And behind the air-shock wave there is the debris cloud. Unfortunately, no data is given on the cloud&#8217;s details, but a little bit higher, at height 5 km it has speed 10-11 km\/s, density 2.5 kg\/(m^3); temperature: 7000-8000 K . And such giant plasma column is to hit the ground (a forest) at great speed!&#8230;<br \/>\nHere I just want to attract attention that in reality many groups of trees survived in epicenter, and moreover even some single standing in open places trees have no signs of burns!&#8230;<br \/>\nAnother intriguing detail of the forest fall is that despite the central area of the forest fall is often considered to be covered with standing trees, there are traces of the radial forest fall even in this area too! From the traces, Kulik even came to conclusion about 2 closely spaced epicenters!<br \/>\nAnyway, the traces is one more problem for the meteorite interpretation according to which just the vertical-falling shock wave could be present in the epicentral area.<\/p>\n<p>It is also remarkable, that Korobeinikov&#8217;s and other results of the &#8220;Tunguska spacebody explosion&#8221; calculations point to an angle of inclination of the hypothetical spacebody trajectory must be about 40 degrees (otherwise it is not possible to get resemblance with the Tunguska forest-fall pattern), while from witness&#8217;s accounts it must be no more than about 10-15 degrees (otherwise the fireball could not be seen far away). The only way out for meteorite advocates is to artificially insert &#8220;non-zero aerodynamic lift&#8221; into calculations, but avoiding such aspects as a reality of such &#8220;guided flight&#8221;, and its circumstances (but calculations shows that the meteoritic body can&#8217;t sustain such large overloads).<\/p>\n<p>       <img decoding=\"async\" class=imgright  width=470 height=270  src=\"images\/pages\/Tunguska-chuvar.gif\" title=\"Tunguska-chuvar\">      <\/p>\n<p>Detailed investigation of the Kulikovskii forest-fall conducted by various researchers has shown that there are remarkable deviations of the forest fall from the radial pattern all over the area. The deviations are shown on the picture below (out of scale). The deviations are larger to the east of the epicenter (especially large in the south-east sector of the forest-fall).<\/p>\n<p>Another puzzle for the meteorite interpretation is the area of the forest fall on the ridge Chuvar (23 km, 279), which according to the local Evenks have formed the same morning as the general (Kulikovskii) one. It was discovered by the 1959 expedition. Its square is 30-40 sq. km. and the trees damage was found to occur in about 1908. The peculiarity of that forest fall is that trees were uprooted with their tops to the east (i.e. in the opposite of what expected from the meteorite fall direction). So the supporters of the meteorite fall prefer not to discuss it, or at least, talk just about accidental coincidence. And the coincidence, as could be seen on the picture below (out of scale) is rather remarkable&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>In reality many groups of trees survived at the epicenter [10,11]. Moreover, some of the single standing trees were without any traces of burn [11]!<\/p>\n<p>From the character of the trees damage it concludes that at first was the breaking of branches and then a burn at the site of the break [9, 12]. In other words, for the meteorite explosion interpretation it means that the air-shock wave from the explosion came faster than light impulse!<\/p>\n<p>It was stated in 1996 that about 15-60% of survived trees near the epicenter have lightning-like damage [13]. So even L. Kulik thought that the fall was accompanied with lightnings. But how the modern meteorite fall theory could explain many thousands of lightning strikes?<\/p>\n<p>The author also would like to mention the local Evenks reports about spots of melted sand and soil.<\/p>\n<p>Kirensk (491 km, 131). Shocks lasted for 45 minutes. Windows rattled. Weak swing.<br \/>\nthe &#8220;meteorite explosion&#8221; theory can not explain the long duration of seismic disturbances in Irkutsk.<br \/>\nInterestingly, there is a report from the Stepanovskii mine, a short distance from the town of Yuzhno-Yeniseisk, that an earthquake struck this area at 23.43 UT June 29, i.e. a half hour before the &#8220;fall of the Tunguska meteorite&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>THE SKY GLOW<br \/>\nThe unusual glow in the sky was first observed days before the event. Beginning on June 23, 1908, atmospheric optical amonalies were observed in many places of Western Europe, the European part of Russia and Western Siberia. They gradually increased in intensity until June 29 and then reached a peak in the early morning of July 1st. These anomalies included an unprecedentedly active formation of mesospheric (noctilucent) clouds, bright &#8220;volcanic&#8221; twilights, disturbances in the normal motion of the Arago and Babinet neutral points, a possible increase in the emission of the night sky, and unprecedentedly intense and long solar halos. Later on, after July 1, these effects decreased exponentially. <\/p>\n<p>from  http:\/\/olkhov.narod.ru\/tunguska.htm<\/p>\n<p> &nbsp; <\/p>\n<h3 align=center> The Tunguska Event <\/h3>\n<p>By Rob Schwarz on May 23, 2012<\/p>\n<p>According to one eyewitness report, &#8220;the sky split in two and fire appeared high and wide over the forest&#8230;but then the sky shut closed, and a strong thump sounded, and I was thrown a few metres.&#8221;<br \/>\nAll told, the force of the shockwave was likely equivalent to &#8220;1,000 times the power&#8221; of Little Boy, the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima in 1945. <\/p>\n<p><b>For days after the event, the skies above Asia and Europe were haunted by a mysterious glow.  The Daily Mail reports that &#8220;Britain was lit for several days by a beautiful white and yellow sky, bright enough for midnight games of cricket and golf across the country.&#8221;<\/b><\/p>\n<p>To this day, the exact cause of this strange occurrence remains unknown. It has come to be called the Tunguska Event.<\/p>\n<p>However, there was no crater. Scorched earth surrounded the epicenter of the explosion, but trees surrounding the initial blast area were strangely left standing, and only those farther away were knocked down.<br \/>\nJust as well, the glowing skies and little physical evidence of an impact led many to believe it was actually a comet that had exploded and disintegrated. The atmospheric glow may have been caused by reflections of water vapor.<br \/>\n&#8220;Microscopic silicate and magnetite spheres&#8221; were found in the soil, containing &#8220;high proportions of nickel relative to iron.&#8221; This indicated a clear link to a meteoric origin, most probably a meteorite airburst given the lack of other physical evidence.<br \/>\nIn fact, according to the U.S. Air Force, large meteorite airbursts occur within the upper atmosphere at least once a year. It&#8217;s just rare for them to be so massive and to occur so close to the ground, as was potentially the case with the Tunguska explosion.<br \/>\nThis is what most scientists believe to have happened. If it were an airburst, the trees surrounding the epicenter would have been left standing because the airburst would have forced air downward vertically, then outward. And the mysterious, glowing skies would have likely been the result of meteoric dust and other debris lingering in the atmosphere.<br \/>\nEven so, conclusive evidence of the source of the Tunguska explosion has eluded researchers since it occurred in 1908, and its origins are still highly debated.<\/p>\n<p> &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>      <img decoding=\"async\"  class=imgleft  src=\"images\/pages\/Tunguska-04.gif\"  title=\"Tunguska-1908\">    <\/p>\n<p>A violent explosion that took place over the valley of the Stony Tunguska river, in central Siberia, at 7.17 a.m. local time (0h 17m 11s UT), on Jun. 30, 1908, with the epicenter at 0\u00b055&#8242; N, 101\u00b057&#8242; E.13 This location is in the central Siberian area of Russia, about 1,000 km north of the town of Irkutsk and Lake Baikal. The event is now widely attributed in the astronomical community to the detonation of icy material from a comet in the Earth&#8217;s atmosphere. The blast, which stripped or felled trees out to a radius of 40 km, burned reindeer to death, and sent the tents of nomads flying through the air, was preceded by the observed passage across the sky of a dazzling blue bolide, said to be almost as bright as the Sun, trailing a column of dust. The explosion registered at seismic stations across Eurasia, and produced fluctuations in atmospheric pressure strong enough to be detected by the recently invented barographs in Britain. Over the next few weeks, night skies over Europe and western Russia glowed brightly enough for people to read by. In the United States, the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory and the Mount Wilson Observatory observed a decrease in atmospheric transparency that lasted for several months. The size of the blast was later estimated to be between 10 and 15 megatons.<\/p>\n<p>      <img decoding=\"async\"  class=imgcenter  src=\"images\/pages\/Tunguska-03.gif\"  title=\"Tunguska-1908\">    <\/p>\n<p><b> First impressions \u2013 or lack of them <\/b><\/p>\n<p>The first report of the explosion was in the Irkutsk paper dated July 2, 1908, published two days after the explosion:<\/p>\n<p>The peasants saw a body shining very brightly (too bright for the naked eye) with a bluish-white light&#8230; The body was in the form of &#8216;a pipe&#8217;, i.e. cylindrical. The sky was cloudless, except that low down on the horizon, in the direction in which this glowing body was observed, a small dark cloud was noticed. It was hot and dry and when the shining body approached the ground (which was covered with forest at this point) it seemed to be pulverized, and in its place a loud crash, not like thunder, but as if from the fall of large stones or from gunfire was heard. All the buildings shook and at the same time a forked tongue of flames broke through the cloud. All the inhabitants of the village ran out into the street in panic. The old women wept, everyone thought that the end of the world was approaching. <\/p>\n<p>S.B. Semenov, an eyewitness in the village of Vanovara about 60 km south of the explosion site, gave an excellent information:<\/p>\n<p>I was sitting in the porch of the house at the trading station of Vanovara at breakfast time &#8230; when suddenly in the north &#8230; the sky was split in two and high above the forest the whole northern part of the sky appeared to be covered with fire. At that moment I felt great heat as if my shirt had caught fire; this heat came from the north side. I wanted to pull off my shirt and throw it away, but at that moment there was a bang in the sky, and a mighty crash was heard. I was thrown to the ground about three sajenes [about 7 meters] away from the porch and for a moment I lost consciousness&#8230; The crash was followed by noise like stones falling from the sky, or guns firing. The earth trembled, and when I lay on the ground I covered my head because I was afraid that stones might hit it. <\/p>\n<p>Soviet mineralogist Leonid Kulik, who first investigated the event, initially assumed that it had been caused by the fall of a giant iron meteorite but the absence of any crater quickly led to this idea being abandoned. The cometary theory was first put forward in the 1930s by Soviet astronomer I. S. Astapovich1 and English meteorologist Francis Whipple20. However, other more exotic explanations later stemmed from the rumored existence of anomalous radiation at the site.<\/p>\n<p> A prominent Soviet scientist, Alexei Zolotov, after a 17-year investigation, &#8230; noted that the actual area of destruction was &#8220;an amazing demonstration of pinpoint accuracy and humanitarianism.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>   does not explain the magnetite and silicate globules found in the explosion region, nor does it account for the anomalously bright night sky observed over Europe. Beasley and Tinsley conclude,<\/p>\n<p> &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>      <img decoding=\"async\"  class=imgleft  src=\"images\/pages\/Tunguska-1908-n-2008.jpg\"  title=\"Tunguska-1908-and-2008\" \/>  <\/p>\n<p>Some 80 million trees were flattened over an area of 2,000 square km (800 square miles) near the Tunguska River. The blast was 1,000 times more powerful than the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki and generated a shock wave that knocked people to the ground 60km from the epicentre.<\/p>\n<p>Over the next few weeks, night skies were aglow such that one could read in their light, sometimes called &#8220;bright nights.&#8221; In the United States, the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory and the Mount Wilson Observatory observed a decrease in atmospheric transparency that lasted for several months.<\/p>\n<p>Sibir newspaper, July 2, 1908<br \/>\n&#8220;On the 17th of June, around 9 in the AM, we observed an unusual natural occurrence. In the N Karelinski village (200 verst N of Kirensk) the peasants saw to the North-West, rather high above the horizon, some strangely bright (impossible to look at) bluish-white heavenly body, which for 10 minutes moved downwards. The body appeared as a &#8220;pipe&#8221;, i.e. a cylinder. The sky was cloudless, only a small dark cloud was observed in the general direction of the bright body. It was hot and dry. As the body neared the ground (forest), the bright body seemed to smudge, and then turned into a giant billow of black smoke, and a loud knocking (not thunder) was heard, as if large stones were falling, or artillery was fired. All buildings shook. At the same time the cloud began emitting flames of uncertain shapes. All villagers were stricken with panic and took to the streets, women cried, thinking it was the end of the world. &#8220;The author of these lines was meantime in the forest about 6 verst N of Kirensk, and heard to the NE some kind of artillery barrage, that repeated in intervals of 15 minutes at least 10 times. In Kirensk in a few buildings in the walls facing north-east window glass shook.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Siberian Life newspaper, July 27, 1908<br \/>\n&#8220;When the meteorite fell, strong tremors in the ground were observed, and near the Lovat village of the Kansk uezd two strong explosions were heard, as if from large-caliber artillery.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Krasnoyaretz newspaper, July 13, 1908<br \/>\n&#8220;Kezhemskoe village. On the 17th an unusual atmospheric event was observed. At 7:43 the noise akin to a strong wind was heard. Immediately afterwards a horrific thump sounded, followed by an earthquake which literally shook the buildings, as if they were hit by a large log or a heavy rock. The first thump was followed by a second, and then a third. Then &#8211; the interval between the first and the third thumps were accompanied by an unusual underground rattle, similar to a railway upon which dozens of trains are traveling at the same time. Afterwards for 5 to 6 minutes an exact likeness of artillery fire was heard: 50 to 60 salvoes in short, equal intervals, which got progressively weaker. After 1.5 &#8211; 2 minutes after one of the &#8220;barrages&#8221; six more thumps were heard, like cannon firing, but individual, loud, and accompanied by tremors. &#8220;The sky, at the first sight, appeared to be clear. There was no wind and no clouds. However upon closer inspection to the North, i.e. where most of the thumps were heard, a kind of an ashen cloud was seen near the horizon which kept getting smaller and more transparent, and possibly by around 2-3 p.m. completely disappeared.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Selected Eyewitness Reports<br \/>\nTestimony of S. Semenov, as recorded by Leonid Kulik&#8217;s expedition in 1930.<br \/>\n&#8220;At breakfast time I was sitting by the house at Vanavara trading post (65 kilometres\/40 miles south of the explosion), facing North. [&#8230;] I suddenly saw that directly to the North, over Onkoul&#8217;s Tunguska road, the sky split in two and fire appeared high and wide over the forest (as Semenov showed, about 50 degrees up &#8211; expedition note). The split in the sky grew larger, and the entire Northern side was covered with fire. At that moment I became so hot that I couldn&#8217;t bear it, as if my shirt was on fire; from the northern side, where the fire was, came strong heat. I wanted to tear off my shirt and throw it down, but then the sky shut closed, and a strong thump sounded, and I was thrown a few yards. I lost my senses for a moment, but then my wife ran out and led me to the house. After that such noise came, as if rocks were falling or cannons were firing, the earth shook, and when I was on the ground, I pressed my head down, fearing rocks would smash it. When the sky opened up, hot wind raced between the houses, like from cannons, which left traces in the ground like pathways, and it damaged some crops. Later we saw that many windows were shattered, and in the barn a part of the iron lock snapped.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Testimony of Chuchan of Shanyagir tribe, as recorded by I.M.Suslov in 1926.<br \/>\n&#8220;We had a hut by the river with my brother Chekaren. We were sleeping. Suddenly we both woke up at the same time. Somebody shoved us. We heard whistling and felt strong wind. Chekaren said, &#8216;Can you hear all those birds flying overhead?&#8217; We were both in the hut, couldn&#8217;t see what was going on outside. Suddenly, I got shoved again, this time so hard I fell into the fire. I got scared. Chekaren got scared too. We started crying out for father, mother, brother, but no one answered. There was noise beyond the hut, we could hear trees falling down. Me and Chekaren got out of our sleeping bags and wanted to run out, but then the thunder struck. This was the first thunder. The Earth began to move and rock, wind hit our hut and knocked it over. My body was pushed down by sticks, but my head was in the clear. Then I saw a wonder: trees were falling, the branches were on fire, it became mighty bright, how can I say this, as if there was a second sun, my eyes were hurting, I even closed them. It was like what the Russians call lightning. And immediately there was a loud thunderclap. This was the second thunder. The morning was sunny, there were no clouds, our Sun was shining brightly as usual, and suddenly there came a second one!<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Me and Chekaren had some difficulty getting under from the remains of our hut. Then we saw that above, but in a different place, there was another flash, and loud thunder came. This was the third thunder strike. Wind came again, knocked us off our feet, struck against the fallen trees.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We looked at the fallen trees, watched the tree tops get snapped off, watched the fires. Suddenly Chekaren yelled &#8216;Look up&#8217; and pointed with his hand. I looked there and saw another flash, and it made another thunder. But the noise was less than before. This was the fourth strike, like normal thunder.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Now I remember well there was also one more thunder strike, but it was small, and somewhere far away, where the Sun goes to sleep.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Soviet experiments performed in the mid-1960s, with model forests (made of matches) and small explosive charges slid downward on wires, produced butterfly-shaped blast patterns strikingly similar to the pattern found at the Tunguska site. The experiments suggested that the object had approached at an angle of roughly 30 degrees from the ground and 115 degrees from north and had exploded in mid-air.<\/p>\n<p> &nbsp; <\/p>\n<hr>\n<p> &nbsp; <\/p>\n<blockquote class=small>\n<h3> Tesla vs. Einstein: The Ether &#038; the Birth of the New Physics <\/h3>\n<p>  By MARC J. SEIFER<\/p>\n<p> In his early 1890s lectures at Columbia University, the Chicago World&#8217;s Fair and at Royal Societies in Paris and London, building on the ideas of Isaac Newton and Lord Kelvin, Tesla demonstrated and discussed the structure of atoms as being similar to solar systems and wave-like and particle-like aspects to what later became known as the photon. Colleagues he lectured before and corresponded with included many Nobel Prize winners like Wilhelm Roentgen, J.J. Thompson, Lord Raleigh, Ernst Rutherford and Robert Millikan and other scientists such as Elmer Sperry, Sir William Crookes, Sir Oliver Lodge, Lord Kelvin, Heinreich Hertz and Hermann von Helmholtz.<br \/>\nAs far as I know, no standard text on the history of physics mentions Tesla even though these ideas would lead to Nobel Prizes when they were further developed by Rutherford and Bohr (with their solar-system description of the atom with electrons orbiting the nucleus) and Einstein&#8217;s discovery of the photoelectric effect, which was equivalent to Tesla&#8217;s wave and particle-like description of light.<br \/>\nHowever, another idea which Tesla discussed was abandoned by modern physicists, and that was the concept of the all pervasive ether. This led to a number of key differences between Tesla&#8217;s view of the world as compared to that of Albert Einstein (1879-1955). <\/p>\n<p>On a separate front, the inventor stated that the impulses transmitted from his turn of the century Wardenclyffe wireless transmitting tower would also travel at velocities in excess of the speed of light. <\/p>\n<p>Concrete proof that relativity can be violated can be found in George Gamow&#8217;s watershed book <u>Thirty Years That Shook Physics<\/u>. Gamow, one of the founding fathers of quantum physics, tells us that in the mid-1920&#8217;s, Goudsmit and Uhlenbeck discovered not only that electrons were ortho-rotating, but also that they were spinning at 1.37 times the speed of light. Gamow makes it clear that this discovery did not violate anything in quantum physics, what it violated was Einstein&#8217;s principle that nothing could travel faster than the speed of light. Paul Adrian Dirac studied the problem. Following in the footsteps of Herman Minkowski, who used an imaginary number i, (the square root of -1) to be equivalent to the time coordinate in space-time equations, Dirac assigned the same number i to electron spin. In this way he was able to combine relativity with quantum mechanics and won a Nobel Prize for the idea in the process (1966, pp. 120-121). That was the upside. The downside was that the finding that elementary particles spin faster than the speed of light as a matter of course went the way of the passenger pigeon. No physicist talks about this anymore. What this means is that the entire evolution of 20th and nascent 21st century physics is evolving ignoring this key Goudsmit and Uhlenbeck finding. The ramifications suggest that elementary particles, by their nature, interface dimensions. Because they are spinning faster than the speed of light, the idea is that they are drawing this energy from the ether, a pre-physical realm, and converting the energy into material form.<br \/>\n. . . <\/p>\n<p>In Tesla&#8217;s model, a force-field would curve light around large bodies. These ideas were related to Tesla&#8217;s original theories on gravity which do not seem to have ever been published but can be ascertained by decoding related articles by or about Tesla from the 1930s and 40s. They also coincide with some of the most recent theories on physics, gravity and magnetism which challenge Einstein&#8217;s claim that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. E. Lerner, writing about &#8220;Magnetic Whirlwinds&#8221; in Science Digest in 1985, stated that &#8220;magnetism is as fundamental as gravity.&#8221; Citing the research and theories of plasma physicist A. Peratt of Los Alamos National Laboratory, Lerner noted:<br \/>\nAstronomers using [a]&#8230; radio telescope [have]&#8230; observed filaments of gas arcing far above the galactic plane. These twisting spirals appeared to be held together by a magnetic field&#8230; stretching across 500 light years&#8230;. Such magnetic vortices [may] play a major role in the universe&#8230; as important&#8230; as gravitation.<\/p>\n<p>&#8230; Even though most of the great scientists of the day such as Maxwell, Faraday, Kelvin, Fitzgerald and Lorentz all accepted the obvious conclusion that there had to a medium of transfer in space, i.e., the ether, all of this was glossed over. This led to a generally accepted conclusion that the ether did not exist and that is the situation today, a full century later! It would take Einstein 15 years before he addressed this glaring misconception but the damage had already been done.<\/p>\n<p> <b> In 1920, <\/b> lecturing at the University of Leiden, on the topic &#8220;Ether and the Theory of Relativity,&#8221;  <b> Einstein stated outright that the ether did exist, <\/b> that is was necessary as a medium of transfer because light also had wave-like properties. He even wrote Lorentz to clarify this point. But by now, the damage had been done. This lecture received little notice, it was ignored in Roland Clark&#8217;s watershed biography on Einstein published in 1971, and so the 20th and early 21st centuries evolved in such a way to dismiss entirely ether theory.<\/p>\n<p>From the perspective of popular science writers, &#8220;belief in the nonexistence of the ether remained alive, but in actuality, by 1916, Einstein had replaced the old ether in his theory of General Relativity by curved space-time itself. Only, this new \u2018ether&#8217; is no longer a medium in three-dimensional Euclidean space, but in four-dimensional non-Euclidean (curved) space-time.&#8221; It was this idea that was completely unacceptable to Tesla, and he criticised Einstein in the 1930s because of it.<\/p>\n<p>Initially, Einstein was still too caught up in his particle view and in Mach&#8217;s principle which suggested that all matter in the universe was interdependent. Thus, concerning rotating bodies, Einstein would write the young mathematician Karl Schwarzchild on January 9, 1916, &#8220;Inertia is simply an interaction between masses, not an effect in which space of itself is involved, separate from the observed mass.&#8221; Schwarzchild, Isaacson points out, disagreed. Now, four years later, in 1920 after reconsidering the necessity of the ether, for instance, as a means to propagate light, Einstein changed his mind. He abandoned Mach&#8217;s Principle and now saw that a rotating body did not obtain its inertia from, and in relations to, all the rest of the matter in the universe [Mach&#8217;s Principle], but on its own accord due simply to &#8220;its state of rotation [because] space is endowed with physical qualities.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Because of the power of de Broglie&#8217;s emphasis on particle wave theory, Einstein shifted gears to be current. Back ahead of the curve, he lectured on the ether at Leiden University (discussed above). Einstein never came to view gravity as the absorption of ether by elementary particles and electromagnetism as a product of this process, because to do so would be to abandon relativity. Einstein also never was able to integrate gravity into his grand unification scheme, a problem he wrestled with for the entire last half of his life.<\/p>\n<p>Once it is realised that electrons spin at speeds in excess of the speed of light, a new paradigm is born. The idea simply is that the elementary particles, by their nature, are absorbing ether all the time. This influx is what gravity is. As ether is absorbed two things happen. (1) The process enables the elementary particles to maintain their spin, and (2) Simultaneously, this etheric energy, probably stemming from what some physicists call the zero point energy realm, which is a vast reservoir of untapped energy, is transformed into electromagnetic energy. That is Grand Unification, Einstein&#8217;s dream of how to combine gravity with electromagnetism.<\/p>\n<p>Tesla understood ether theory a lot better than Einstein did, but obviously, Tesla also did not truly understand the ramifications of Einstein&#8217;s famous equation E=mc2. He dismissed it as mathematical poppycock. Had he lived a few more years to see the explosion of the atom bomb, Tesla would have been forced to re-evaluate what he had discarded, and had Einstein re-evaluated the full ramifications of Tesla&#8217;s ether theory, he may have been able to achieve his grand dream of unifying gravity with electromagnetism, a process explainable by a full understanding of ether theory.<\/p>\n<p>A large number of thinking physicists believe that an ether of sorts exists, and that forces of some type may transcend lightspeed. Once one begins to study ether theory, profound new insights concerning such things as particle spin, zero point energy, the fundamental structure of matter and space, the constancy of lightspeed and the link between gravity and electromagnetism begin to emerge.<\/p>\n<p>The above is excerpted and adapted with permission from Marc J. Seifer&#8217;s book Transcending The Speed Of Light: Consciousness, Quantum Physics &#038; the Fifth Dimension <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/aside>\n<p> &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p> &nbsp; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(Manuscript discovered prior to 2009?) The Unknown Tesla Manuscript Proof of the Ether The 1908 Tunguska Event Unknown Manuscript of Nikola Tesla by Mikhail Shapkin FarShores Note: This is a new and more complete version of the unknown &#8216;Tesla&#8217; manuscript, transcribed and translated into English by Mikhail using computer software. It replaces the original copy consisting only of Part 1. Editing has been kept to a absolute minimum in order. . . <a class=\"continue-reading-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fuel-efficient-vehicles.org\/energy-news\/?page_id=1320\">CONTINUE<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":980,"menu_order":90,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,5],"class_list":["post-1320","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","category-alternative-energy","category-innovations-inventions"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fuel-efficient-vehicles.org\/energy-news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1320","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fuel-efficient-vehicles.org\/energy-news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fuel-efficient-vehicles.org\/energy-news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fuel-efficient-vehicles.org\/energy-news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fuel-efficient-vehicles.org\/energy-news\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1320"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/fuel-efficient-vehicles.org\/energy-news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1320\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fuel-efficient-vehicles.org\/energy-news\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/980"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fuel-efficient-vehicles.org\/energy-news\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1320"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fuel-efficient-vehicles.org\/energy-news\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1320"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}