Many great inventions have been suppressed in the past
Today there are great(!) inventions begging to be developed, free from the powerful, energy barons of today, whose power and wealth will be wiped out if the status quo is altered – not in their favor. But, “no problem”, companies are still preserving their positions. Buying politicians so easily, giving them more than enough to defeat those who who won’t be bought, who want “a change”.
May 13th 2010 – Update: Suppression still going on!!
See Energy saving work being sabotaged!
Magnets exert tremendous forces over short distances for long periods of time, with no energy input. “almost free energy” Energy was consumed to align the magnets, but, once aligned, they exert tremendous force.
A motor run solely by magnets was originally suggested by Nikola Tesla in 1905.
Today: “Engineers of Hitachi Magnetics Corp. of California have stated that a motor run solely by magnets is feasible and logical but the politics of the matter make it impossible for them to pursue developing a magnet motor or any device that would compete with the energy cartels.”
In the late 1800′s Wesley W. Gary patented 2 designs
Ed Gray was issued several patents, got close to production, and was bankrupt and killed for it. In 2001 Troy Reed built one and powered his converted electric car with it.
| if you have an article like these, let us know and we will post it! | |
| April 1922 | Scientific American, page 262 Steam car that is different |
| January 1928 | Scientific American, pages 44-46 Will the stream automobile return? |
| October 5, 1929 | Literary Digest, page 23 Gas-electric auto gearless automobile. |
| January 1930 | Scientific American . page 65 Gas-electric auto. |
| June 3, 1939 | Business Week, pages 44-45 Multi-fuel engine. |
| Dec. 13, 1943 | Newsweek, page 69 Ford’s ideal motor; opposed piston engine. |
| March 1946 | Popular Science, page 78; 59 lb. motor propels Crosely. |
| July 1946 | Popular Science, page 130 – 131; Sam Baylin of Montreal, Canada invented a ‘rotating piston engine’ with only three moving parts. see it below |
| October 1948 | Popular Science, page 169 Steam conversion powered stock car. |
| July 1949 | Popular Science, page 216 Turbine drives small steam car. |
| November 1950 | Science Digest, pages 29 – 34 Revolution of the free-piston engine. |
| November 1951 | Popular Science, page 193 General Motors has built an engine that uses both gasoline and alcohol ! |
| April 25, 1953 | Business Week , page 101-107 Generating more power from less fuel — free piston engine–production. |
| September 1955 | Mechanix Illustrated, page 90-92,204-205, Inventor’s Miracle Car May Revolutionize Auto Industry see it |
| April 23, 1956 | Time. page 102 New Engine – -free piston. |
| June 1956 | Scientific American, page 66 Free piston engine. |
| July 1956 | Popular Science, page 101 Free piston engine tried in a car! |
| July 1957 | Science Digest, page 93 Free piston jet engine will power cars and plants. |
| January 1961 | Science Digest Challenge to the gas engine. |
| May 1962 | Reader’s Digest, pages 109 – 112 Auto engine burns almost anything! |
| October 12, 1963 | Business Week, page 48; 35 mpg engine. |
| Sept. 1968 | Mechanix Illustrated, with photos, Ford steam engine. |
| April 1969 | Popular Science Amazing Ponitac mini car! (not for sale.) |
| May 1969 | Popular Science “French Piston Engine has no Crankshaft” page 69 |
| June 1969 | Popular Science “Modern STEAM CARS are Really on the Way” pg. 45 |
| June 1974 | Popular Science Pollution-free engine saves fuel. |
| May 1976 | Mechanix Illustrated, Steam engine for your car. |
| January 1977 | Mechanix Illustrated, pages 50-51 Multi-fuel Bricklin engine. |
Incidents of Suppression
In 1982; in Denver, Col.; I designed and built an ugly but functional vapor carb. for my 1967 Dodge Coronet. It used exhaust heat to assist in the vaporizing of the gasoline- which was sprayed into the heat exchanger at the bottom of the device- and the vapor rose through a maze of approx. 25 feet folded back and forth on itself at which it exited into a 2 1/2″ ID hose (radiator hose) which I ran to an adapter on top of my existing carb which I used to start the 318 cubic inch engine. I achieved 87 miles per gallon. The machine shop that I had help me make the contraption told me that they had helped an earlier inventor with a very NICE carb. to adapt it to his auto – with approximately similar results. (Mine only ran me about $500 total w/ all the junk you have to assemble to get it to work.) They warned me not to make it too public, because the other inventor got the notice of some oil people from Texas who came up and gave him an offer to assume his invention. He refused. His home and workshop burned down 2 days later! He moved to parts unknown.
I just thought you might find it interesting to hear from someone who has done this before. My point in the whole thing was; “If I could achieve 80+ mpg with a total of $500 invested- on a ’67 Dodge Coronet 318 V8; what could Chrysler do with the millions they have to invest?”
“In 1933 Charles Nelson Pogue made headlines when he drove a 1932 Ford V8, 200 miles on a gallon of gas during a demonstration conducted by The Ford Motor Company in Winnipeg, Manitoba using his super-carb system.” The Pogue Carb went into production and was sold openly. [317 were sold?] In the opening months of 1936, stock exchange offices and brokers were swamped with orders to dump all oil stock immediately. His invention caused such shock waves through the stock market, that the US and Canadian governments both stepped in and [successfully] applied pressure to stifle him.
“he saw Mr. Pogue in the midst of a bunch of oil company big wigs. He named the wigs, but I forget the names. They were heads of Texaco, Shell, Esso, etc. Some of them had red faces, and Mr. Pogue looked like a trapped rabbit.”
Pogue went overnight from impoverished inventor to the manager of a successful factory making oil filters for the motor industry.
see “Charles Pogue Carb.” (index on the right, column)
Ron Brandt is the inventor of the perm-mag motor. He is of retirement age.
When he was a young man, he invented a 90-mpg carburetor. He was paid a visit by a man from Standard Oil, another man, and two men wearing US Marshal uniforms. They told him that if he ever made another carburetor, they would kill him, his wife, and two young children. He was quickly persuaded that his life wasn’t worth a “damn” carburetor. He happened to think to memorize the badge numbers of the two US Marshals and so had an attorney in Washington, DC check with the US Marshal’s office. They had no record of the two badge numbers.
Tom Ogle, a 24 year old mechanic drove 200 miles in a 1970 351 ci. Ford on 2 gallons of gas. Other mechanics and engineers checked for hidden tanks, none were found. Reporters and a camera crew went with him 100 miles out and back; 200 miles 2 gallons. He claimed from the beginning that he did not know exactly how the system worked, just that it did and he proved it time and again. He had hoped other engineers would help to explain what he was doing. I have seen three different news articles on him and reprinted here for your understanding. One states he turned down $ 25 million from backers that would keep it off the market. He had a hard time getting backers that had integrity. Everybody wanted controlling interest and he knew it was going on the back shelf. Tom resisted and tried to get it on the market. Later he was shot and survived, only four months later he did die of an overdose of darvon and alcohol with no suicide note. Nobody explained what became of his idea. A patent was issued Dec. 11, 1979 # 4,177,779. Four months after his death.
see “Tom Ogle Carb.” (index on the right, column)
more on Energy Suppression …
will this suffer the same fate as all the above inventions?
Another, new, great breakthrough
|
1929: The President of General Motors predicts 80 mpg cars within 10 years
|
Shell 1959 Opel, in 1973 – with winning engineer (?)

( can anyone help us get his name!? )
Shell experimental 1959 Opel got 376 mpg in 1973

The Shell experimental 1959 Opel today

May 26, 2007
Star Rotor motor from Texas A&M Univ.

Not as good as electric motors but, double or triple the milage.
Proof that there are inventors and their inventions “out there”
A. Revetec X4v2

Mr. Bradley Howell-Smith invented the “Controlled Combustion Engine” (CCE)
40%+ increased fuel efficiency – road tested
B. “The Most Efficient Ever Invented – - The Bourke Engine”.

The Bourke engine patents are #2,122,676 2,122,677 and 2,172,670.
The Bourke engine operates on the basis of a very simple principle. The basic component is of the opposed-cylinder, two-stroke type. However, these two-cylinder opposed units can be bolted together in clusters to achieve an engine of almost any displacement value desired. The system has co-operative pistons. They are connected by one rigid connecting rod that shuttles through an oil reservoir in a sealed crankcase. There are only two moving parts in the engine:
a) the piston connecting rod and
b) the crank shaft.
The multitude of other parts found in a conventional internal combustion engine are not needed in the Bourke engine.
The 100 mpg OPOC Engine

2010 : funded by 2 billionaires!
Inventions, page 2
why are these inventions not incorperated in todays auto industry? their has to be a way to improve fuel mileage by either heating fuel to make it a vapor that will burn cleaner and faster and useing much less of it. Also try incorperating some of the old warner anti drag standard transmissions AMC used in the 60′s that would inprove MPG’S overall.
nothing surprises me about big oil or big drug companies. Both as crooked as companies can get.
July 1957 Science Digest, page 93 Free piston engine will power cars and plants.
could you publish that article? Please and Thank you.
Why that one? How about one of the others?
None-the-less, it turns out that it is a Free piston jet engine and it was reprinted from Popular Mechanics: Free piston jet engine
So, if we as the masses of people find this technology to be made, whether easy, or difficult, we should be able to create a social system where, for the benefit of better technology for mankind, we should pull people with resources to make these types of technologies together to create a system of separate assembly given there be a one size exact diagram of the technologies. People who are enthusiasts would well support such technologies as it has more potential with power output vs. a combination of fuel/weight/application/and upgrading. These are things society can come together to make together, independantly. That way, there is no wait for a company to make it. It would be built by the people, for the people. …
Sorry, but what are you smoking?: “create a social system” ?; “society can come together” ?; “built by the people” ?; “one size exact diagram” ?;
Rejoin reality and read what the “society” we have right now has been doing in Washington and in the Gulf and, where it affects new inventions specifically, the U.S. Patent Office.